ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF METAL COVER IN PREVENTING RADIATION LEAKAGE IN MICROWAVE-BASED GASIFICATION REACTOR

Vira Rahayu; Tri Ratnasari; Muhammad Arif Rahmatullah; Yono Hadi Pramono; Gatut Yudoyono

doi:10.26740/ifi.v14n3.p404-411

Authors

Vira Rahayu Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Universitas Billfath
Tri Ratnasari Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Muhammad Arif Rahmatullah Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Yono Hadi Pramono Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Gatut Yudoyono Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/ifi.v14n3.p404-411

Keywords:

Microwave Gasification, Microwave Leakage, Shielding, Skin depth, renewable energy

Abstract

Abstract

Microwave-assisted gasification, which converts biomass and plastic waste into syngas, has significant promise for the production of clean renewable energy. This technology has the potential to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and address waste management challenges. Operational safety, particularly with microwave leakage, is a significant issue due to stringent standards for microwave exposure. This study evaluates the effectiveness of several metallic materials as microwave shields in microwave gasification reactors. This study investigates the effectiveness of 2 mm thick metal sheets made of copper, aluminum, iron, and stainless steel in reducing microwave leakage at a frequency of 2.45 GHz. Experimental results indicated that copper and aluminum are particularly effective shields. Copper attained a remarkable leakage reduction of 99.53% (from 105.6 W/m² to 0.5 W/m²) while aluminum reached a decrease of 97.35% (from 105.6 W/m2 to 2.8 W/m2). Efficient reflection and absorption of microwave energy are facilitated by the extremely low skin depth values of both materials, which is consistent with their high effectiveness. However, iron and stainless steel also demonstrated a strong capacity to reduce leakage, with an efficacy of 89.96% (reducing leakage to 10.6 W/m2 ) and 73.86% (reducing leakage to 27.6 W/m2). Still, their performance was influenced by more complex magnetic properties. These results indicate that copper and aluminum are ideal choices for primary microwave shielding applications in gasification reactors. Conversely, iron and stainless steel, while less efficient as primary shields, offer excellent mechanical strength and corrosion resistance, making them suitable for auxiliary structural components. Therefore, a hybrid design integrating a thin shielding layer of copper or aluminum onto these structural elements is proposed for optimal microwave containment. This study provides crucial insights for the design of safer and more efficient microwave gasification reactors, thereby supporting the development of responsible renewable energy technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Basu P. Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis and Torrefaction: Practical Design and Theory. Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis and Torrefaction: Practical Design and Theory. 2013;1–530.

2. Zhang Y, Wan L, Guan J, Xiong Q, Zhang S, Jin X. A Review on Biomass Gasification: Effect of Main Parameters on Char Generation and Reaction. Energy and Fuels [Internet]. 2020 Nov 19 [cited 2024 Mar 21];34(11):13438–55. Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02900

3. Safarian S, Unnþórsson R, Richter C. A review of biomass gasification modelling. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2019 Aug 1;110:378–91.

4. Levinson ML. High Power Microwave Waste Management. US20090121798A1, 2009.

5. Arena U, Zaccariello L, Mastellone ML. Tar removal during the fluidized bed gasification of plastic waste. Waste Management. 2009 Feb 1;29(2):783–91.

6. Pinto F, Franco C, André RN, Miranda M, Gulyurtlu I, Cabrita I. Co-gasification study of biomass mixed with plastic wastes. Fuel. 2002 Feb 1;81(3):291–7.

7. Salaudeen SA, Arku P, Dutta A. Gasification of Plastic Solid Waste and Competitive Technologies. Plastics to Energy: Fuel, Chemicals, and Sustainability Implications. 2019 Jan 1;269–93.

8. Shahabuddin M, Alam MT, Krishna BB, Bhaskar T, Perkins G. A review on the production of renewable aviation fuels from the gasification of biomass and residual wastes. Bioresour Technol [Internet]. 2020;312(May):123596. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123596

9. Li J, Tao J, Yan B, Jiao L, Chen G, Hu J. Review of microwave-based treatments of biomass gasification tar. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021 Oct 1;150:111510.

10. Ke C, Zhang Y, Gao Y, Pan Y, Li B, Wang Y, et al. Syngas production from microwave-assisted air gasification of biomass: Part 1 model development. Renew Energy. 2019 Sep 1;140:772–8.

11. Menéndez JA, Domínguez A, Inguanzo M, Pis JJ. Microwave-induced drying, pyrolysis and gasification (MWDPG) of sewage sludge: Vitrification of the solid residue. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2005 Aug 1;74(1–2):406–12.

12. Arpia AA, Nguyen TB, Chen WH, Dong C Di, Ok YS. Microwave-assisted gasification of biomass for sustainable and energy-efficient biohydrogen and biosyngas production: A state-of-the-art review. Chemosphere. 2022 Jan 1;287:132014.

13. Hou X, Feng XR, Jiang K, Zheng YC, Liu JT, Wang M. Recent progress in smart electromagnetic interference shielding materials. J Mater Sci Technol [Internet]. 2024 Jul 1 [cited 2025 Jun 19];186:256–71. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1005030224001154

14. IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz - Corrigenda 2. 2020 Sep 24 [cited 2025 May 15]; Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9238523/

15. Barron D, Nordh LE. Microwave oven safety. Development of Packaging and Products for Use in Microwave Ovens, Second Edition [Internet]. 2020 Jan 1 [cited 2025 Jun 18];445–56. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780081027134000177

16. Bachir G, Abdechafik H, Mecheri K. Comparison electromagnetic shielding effectiveness between single layer and multilayer shields. Proceedings - 2016 51st International Universities Power Engineering Conference, UPEC 2016. 2016 Jul 2;2017-January:1–5.

17. Pandey R, Tekumalla S, Gupta M. EMI shielding of metals, alloys, and composites. Materials for Potential EMI Shielding Applications: Processing, Properties and Current Trends [Internet]. 2020 Jan 1 [cited 2025 Jun 19];341–55. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B978012817590300021X

18. Iqbal S, Ahmad S. Conducting polymer composites: An efficient EMI shielding material. Materials for Potential EMI Shielding Applications: Processing, Properties and Current Trends. 2019 Jan 1;257–66.

19. Chung DDL, Ozturk M. Electromagnetic skin depth of cement paste and its thickness dependence. Journal of Building Engineering [Internet]. 2022 Jul 15 [cited 2025 Jun 16];52:104393. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710222004065?casa_token=JEZkfos_rhcAAAAA:C6HZ-obFSLnxf8WQhsvT2Aq7R2tSVE55WEPR3qFyypVH3QIhx_-NAJO3XRe-HkJFodF7BamovA

20. Kumar R, Sahoo S, Joanni E. Composites based on layered materials for absorption of microwaves and electromagnetic shielding. Carbon N Y [Internet]. 2023 Jun 25 [cited 2025 Jun 19];211:118072. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008622323003172

21. Durairaj L, Murugesan M. Recent innovations in EMI shielding materials for stealth technology. Synth Met [Internet]. 2025 Jun 1 [cited 2025 Jun 19];312:117874. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379677925000505

22. Kumari N, Meena S, Singhal R, Choubey RK, Dwivedi UK. Advanced material for EMI shielding. Advanced Radiation Shielding Materials: Radiation and Radiological Protection [Internet]. 2024 Jan 1 [cited 2025 Jun 19];195–226. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780323953870000145

23. Rubežienė V, Varnaitė-Žuravliova S. EMI shielding textile materials. Materials for Potential EMI Shielding Applications: Processing, Properties and Current Trends. 2019 Jan 1;357–78.

24. Kausar A. Hybrid polymeric nanocomposites with EMI shielding applications. Materials for Potential EMI Shielding Applications: Processing, Properties and Current Trends. 2019 Jan 1;227–36.