Overlap as Conversational Strategies in an American Daytime Talk Show “The View”

  • Yuli Nurhalima Niapele Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Lisetyo Ariyanti
  • Slamet Setiawan
  • Ayunita Leliana
Keywords: Overlapping Speech, Conversation Analysis, Conversational Strategies, The View

Abstract

The present study aims at figuring out the tendency of participants in employing overlap as conversational strategies by notably identifying the resources that herald overlap types along with its features occurring in an American daytime talk show named The View.  The forty-eight minutes of the talk show aired on November 7, 2,019 was retrieved from the official ABC channel in the Youtube platform that has been videotaped. In analyzing and illustrating the data, the present study employed an approach of Conversation Analysis as an inductive-qualitative method. Data collected from hosts and guests’ utterances were transcribed and scrutinized to explore how overlaps are treated in the course of a talk show and parties’ strategies of turn holding and turn claiming. The findings revealed that parties in The View orient to use four types of overlap to deliver their perspective on issues being discussed. The classification of overlap types relied on the entailment of speaker change leading to whether it is intrusive or collaborative. Backchannels as a collaborative overlap were used as a high number of overlaps, followed by complementary types, anticipated turn-taking, and intrusive overlap of turn-request as the lowest number of overlaps.  In designing the turn, parties tended to use two strategies, namely direct and indirect.

References

Abbas, N.F. (2020). Pragmatics of Overlapping Talk in Therapy Sessions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16, 1251-1263.

Adda, G., Adda-Decker, M., Barras, C., Mareüil, P.B., Habert, B., & Paroubek, P. (2007). Speech Overlap and Interplay with Disfluencies in Political Interviews.

Albert, S. (2017), Research Methods: Conversation Analysis. In M. Schober, D. N. Rapp & A. M. Britt (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Processes (2nd ed., pp. 99-108). London: Taylor and Francis.

Deng, X. (1999). Chinese and Australian Conversational Styles: A Comparative Sociolinguistic Study of Overlap and Listener Response. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1242

French, P., & Local, J. (1983). Turn-Competitive Incomings. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 17-38.

Hayashi, M. 2013. Turn Allocation and Turn Sharing. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), 150-166. Malden: Blackwell

Hilton, K. (2016). The Perception of Overlapping Speech: Effects of Speaker Prosody and Listener Attitudes. Interspeech.

Ilie, C. (2001). Semi-Institutional Discourse: The Case of Talk Shows. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 209-254.

Jefferson, G., 1983. Two Explorations of the Organization of Overlapping Talk in Conversation, 1: Notes on Some Orderliness of Overlap Onset.

Jefferson, G.D. (1986). Notes on ‘Latency’ in Overlap Onset. Human Studies, 9, 153-183. Jefferson, G.D. (2004). Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.

Jorfi, L., & Dowlatabadi, H. (2016). The Types of Overlap as Conversational Strategies in Dispute, the Iranian Live TV Program. Qualitative Research Journal, 16, 110-124.

Kurtic, Emina, Brown, G.J., & Wells, B. (2013). Resources for Turn Competition in Overlapping Talk. Speech Communication 55, 1-23.

Liddicoat, A.J. (2007). An Introduction to Conversation Analysis.

Miles, M., Huberman, A.M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Third Edition. United States of America: SAGE Publication, 2014.

Mondada, L. (2013). The Conversation Analytic Approach to Data Collection. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), 150-166. Malden: Blackwell

Neumaier, T. (2019). Patterns of Conversational Interaction in Varieties of English

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G.D. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn -Taking for Conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.

Schegloff, E.A. (2000). Overlapping Talk and The Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language in Society, 29, 1 - 63.

Shirokov, A. (2019). Alexa Hepburn and Galina B. Bolden. Transcribing for Social Research. London: SAGE Publications, 2017.

Shriberg, E., Stolcke, A., & Baron, D. (2001). Observations on Overlap: Findings and Implications for Automatic Processing of the Multi-Party Conversation. Interspeech.

Sidnell, Jack and Stivers, Tanya. (2013). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing

Signes, C.G. (2000). Gregori Signes, C. 2000. A Genre Based Approach to Daytime Talk on Television. SELL Monographs 1. València: Universitat de València. (ISBN: 84-370-4264-X).

Taboada, M. (2006). Spontaneous and Non-Spontaneous Turn-Taking. Pragmatics, 16, 329-360.

Tanaka, H. (2000). Turn Projection in Japanese Talk-in-Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 1 - 38.

Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends.

Yuan, J., Liberman, M.Y., & Cieri, C. (2007). Towards an Integrated Understanding of Speech Overlaps in Conversation.

Published
2022-02-01
How to Cite
Niapele, Y., Ariyanti, L., Setiawan, S., & Leliana, A. (2022). Overlap as Conversational Strategies in an American Daytime Talk Show “The View”. LANGUAGE HORIZON, 9(3), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.26740/lh.v9n3.p13-23
Section
Articles
Abstract Views: 180
PDF Downloads: 256