PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM PENGELOLAAN BADAN USAHA MILIK DESA (BUMDES) JAYA TIRTA DESA GEDONGARUM KECAMATAN KANOR KABUPATEN BOJONEGORO

Ely Rismanita; Galih Wahyu Pradana

doi:10.26740/publika.v10n1.p149-158

Ely Rismanita S1 Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Hukum, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Galih Wahyu Pradana S1 Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Hukum, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/publika.v10n1.p149-158

Keywords: Community Participation, Village Owned Enterprises (BUMDes), Jaya Tirta

Abstract

BUMDes is a form of community participation in village development, because BUMDes is formed on the initiative and participation of village communities. BUMDes Jaya Tirta is present in the midst of the Gedongarum Village community as a provider of pumping services, rice milling and drug stores. The presence of BUMDes Jaya Tirta has proven to be able to boost the economy of Gedongarum Village. But behind its success, the existence of the community is less involved in the management of BUMDes Jaya Tirta. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the forms of participation of the Gedongarum community in BUMDes Jaya Tirta. This study uses a descriptive research design with a qualitative approach. With the focus of the research, namely analyzing the forms of community participation in the management of BUMDes Jaya Tirta. As an analytical tool in this study, researchers used the theory according to Cohen and Uphoff quoted in (Dwiningrum, 2011: 61-63), including: a). Participation in decision making b). Participation in implementation c). Participation in benefit-taking, and d). Participation in evaluation. The results showed that, in making decisions, the community was still less active in participating. In the implementation, the community has participated well in providing labor and material. However, in its management, community participation is still limited. In taking benefits, the community can feel it both in terms of qualitative and quantitative, but when viewed from the economic side of the community, the existence of BUMDes has not provided significant benefits for the community itself. In the evaluation, the community can participate well. The suggestions given by the researchers include creating non-formal forums to stimulate the community to want to express their aspirations, providing understanding to the community regarding the importance of community participation in decision making, adding new business units and involving the community more in managing BUMDes directly.

Keywords: Community Participation, Village Owned Enterprises (BUMDes), Jaya Tirta.

References

Arnovia, L. (2021). BUMDes Diharapkan Mampu Dorong Perekonomian Desa. BlokBojonegoro.Com. http://blokbojonegoro.com/2021/05/21/bumdes-diharapkan-mampu-dorong-perekonomian-desa/

Barniat, Z. (2019). Otonomi Desa : Konsepsi Teoritis Dan Legal. Jurnal Analisis Sosial Politik, 5(1), 22.

BPK Perwakilan Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. (2014). KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DESA DALAM MENDIRIKAN BADAN USAHA MILIK DESA (BUMDes). https://ntt.bpk.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/KEWENANGAN-PEMERINTAH-DESA-DALAM-MENDIRIKAN.pdf

Dinas Komunikasi dan Informatika Kabupaten. (2020). Ibu Bupati Bojonegoro Minta BUMDes Kategori Maju Diaudit Akuntan Publik Kabupaten. Dinas Komunikasi Dan Informatika Kabupaten Bojonegoro. https://dinkominfo.bojonegorokab.go.id/berita/baca/459

Dinas Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan Desa Provinsi Jawa Timur. (2020). Data Desa Center. https://datadesacenter.dpmd.jatimprov.go.id/

Dwiningrum, S. I. A. (2011). Desentralisasi dan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pendidikan. Pustaka Belajar.

Hayati, E., & Bariroh, K. (2021). Effect Of BUMDes on Increasing PADes in Blawi Village, Karangbinangun District, Lamongan Regency. In Journal of Management (Vol. 11, Issue 2, pp. 253–257). https://enrichment.iocspublisher.org/index.php/enrichment/article/view/80

Kartasasmita, G. (1994). Konsep dan Implikasi. dipresentasikan pada 25 Februari 2011, Jurusan Manejemen dan kebijakan Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Mulyani, E. (2017). Ekonomi Pembagunan. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition (Vol. 6, Issue 11). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Press.

Ndraha, T. (2000). Kybernology (Ilmu Pemerintahan Baru) 1. Rineka Cipta.

Prihatin, R., Mulyadi, M., & Suni, N. (2018). BUMDES DAN KESEJAHTERAAN MASYARAKAT DESA (C. Nurhayati (ed.)). Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian DPR RI.

Purba, B., Rahmadana, M. F., Basmar, E., Sar, D. P., Klara, A., Damanik, D., Faried, A. I., Lie, D., Fazira, N., Rozaini, N., Tanjung, R., & Nugraha, N. A. (2021). Ekonomi Pembangunan (R. Witrianthos (ed.)). Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Qarisman, T., Zakiah, Z., & Kasimin, S. (2021). The strategy of the Development of Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes)-Based Agriculture in the District Juli Bireuen. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6, 72–79. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i8.2820

Sahita, N. E. (2020). COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCEDALAM PENGEMBANGAN BADAN USAHA MILIK DESA (BUM DESA) DI DESA BANDUNGREJO KECAMATAN NGASEM KABUPATEN BOJONEGORO(STUDI PADA PEMERINTAH DESA BANDUNGREJO, PT. PERTAMINA EP CEPU, DAN INSTITUTE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIETY). Journal of Public Sector Innovations, 4.

Sastropoetra, R. A. S. (1988). Partisipasi, Komunikasi, Persuasi dan Disiplin dalam Pembangunan Nasional. Alumni.

Septiani, A. N. (2011). DESA WISATA ( STUDI DI DESA BEJIJONG KECAMATAN TROWULAN KABUPATEN MOJOKERTO ).

Sugiyono. (2013). METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF KUALITATIF DAN R&D. CV. ALFABETA.

Suleman, A. R., Revida, E., Soetijono, I. K., Siregar, R. T., Syofyan, S., Hasibuan, A. F. H., Silitonga, H. P., Rahmadana, M. F., & Marto Silalahi, A. S. (2020). BUMDES Menuju Optimalisasi Ekonomi Desa (J. Simarmata (ed.)). Yayasan Kita Menulis.