ANALYSIS COMPARISON OF PILE BEARING CAPACITY BASED ON ANALYTICAL METHOD AND ALLPILE SOFTWARE
Study Case of The Construction Project of ITS Tower 3 Building in Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/rekats.v14n02.p84-92Keywords:
Foundation planning, Vesic Method (1970), Brom Method, Bearing CapacityAbstract
Foundation planning must consider the bearing capacity of the soil in order to safely carry the load of the structure. So it is necessary to analyze the bearing capacity of the pile based on the analytical approach with the Vesic method and Allpile.V7 software.
This research was conducted with a quantitative approach with a comparative method. The selected methods are expected to be close to the value of the calculation results using Allpile software. Some of the methods used are the Vesic (1970) method to calculate the pile tip bearing capacity (Qp), while the Brom method to calculate the pile side bearing capacity (Qs).
The results of the calculation of the ultimate bearing capacity of the pile with the Vesic method (1977)
obtained the result of 3668.69 kN and the Allpile software results of 3608.73 kN with a difference of 1.63%. While the allowable bearing capacity value with the analytical method is 1222.90 kN and Allpile software is 1202.91 kN with a difference of 1.63%.
Downloads
References
Jonizar, J., Arfan, M., & Ariyansyah, R. (2021). Analisa Daya Dukung Pondasi Tiang Pancang Kelompok Pada Pembangunan Jalan Tol Kapal Betung STA 36+ 619. Bearing: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Teknik Sipil, 7(1), 50-59.
Hasibuan, M. H. M., Sarifah, J., & Irawan, F. (2023). Analisa Konfigurasi Kelompok Tiang Pancang Terhadap Daya dukung dan Efisiensi Tiang Pada Pembangunan Rumah Susun Tanjung Balai. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 1(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.30743/jtsip.v1i2.6688
Hidayah, S. (2024). Perbandingan Perhitungan Daya Dukung Tiang Pancang Berdasarkan Data SPT Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Kuliah Bersama V UMM Dengan Metode Reese and Wirhgt dan Berbasis Apilikasi Allpile. Jurnal Sipil Sains, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.33387/sipilsains.v14i1.7918
Mina, E., & Kusuma, R. I. (2019). 15 Analisis Daya Dukung Dan Penurunan Pondasi Tiang Berdasarkan Data Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Dan Cone Penetration Test (CPT)(Studi Kasus: East Cross Taxiway Bandara Internasional Soekarnl Hatta). Fondasi Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 8(2), 130-141.
Kurniawan, F. R., & Siregar, C. A. (2023). Mayerhoff Analisis Daya Dukung Fondasi Tiang Pancang Dengan Menggunakan Metode dan Menggunakan Aplikasi Allpile. Sistem Infrastruktur Teknik Sipil (SIMTEKS), 3(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.32897/simteks.v3i1.1249
Lestaluhu, A. S., Frans, P. L., & Titaley, H. D. (2024). Tinjauan Fondasi Tiang Pancang Pada Bangunan RTMC Polda Maluku. 3(1).
Patah, D., Ridhayani, I., Manaf, A., & Mahmuda, A. F. (2023). Analisis Daya Dukung Pondasi Proyek Pendidikan SMK 1 Rangas Kabupaten Mamuju Sulawesi Barat. Jurnal Penelitian Enjiniring, 26(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.25042/jpe.052022.04
Pribadi, G. & Yonas Prima Arga Rumbyarso. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan Daya Dukung dan Penurunan Pondasi Tiang Bor Dengan Perhitungan Manual dan Software ALLPILE. Jurnal TESLINK : Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, 5(2), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.52005/teslink.v5i2.301
Susilo, S. (2020). Analisis Daya Dukung Pondasi Dalam Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Jantung dan Paru-Paru Terpadu RSUD Kabupaten Sukoharjo. MoDuluS: Media Komunikasi Dunia Ilmu Sipil, 2(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.32585/modulus.v2i1.1480
Tamara, C., & Fahriani, F. (2017, December). Analisis Konfigurasi Tiang Pancang Kelompok Terhadap Daya Dukung Dan Penurunan Tiang. In FROPIL (Forum Profesional Teknik Sipil) (Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 69-85).
Abstract views: 30
,
PDF Downloads: 0
