Training in Low-Temperature Stirling Engine Kit Modeling for High School Physics Teachers in the Nganjuk Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jodic.v2n2.p25-34Keywords:
low-temperature Stirling engine, thermodynamic, physics education, teaching toolsAbstract
This research examines the difficulties in high school physics education in Nganjuk Regency, Indonesia, specifically the lack of practical teaching tools for successful thermodynamics training. The aim is to assess a community service training program intended to improve the skills of physics instructors via low-temperature Stirling engine modeling kits. The program utilized a descriptive qualitative technique, incorporating preliminary questionnaires, interactive workshops, and practical training sessions in which educators created and employed Stirling engine kits as teaching instruments. Teachers' comments were evaluated using a Likert scale, concentrating on the congruence of training with learning objectives, resources, and student attributes. The results revealed an overall satisfaction score of 89.53%, highlighting notable enhancements in instructors' capacity to engage students and employ project-based learning methodologies. The Stirling engine kits significantly enhanced student engagement and comprehension of thermodynamic fundamentals. The training improved instructors' academic and practical skills while promoting a dynamic and participatory classroom environment. This effort illustrates the capacity of novel teaching tools and collaborative training programs to markedly enhance the quality of physics education, indicating possibilities for scaling to other locations and disciplines. Future proposals involve incorporating these teaching tools into standard curriculum and creating continuous professional development networks for enduring educational progress.
Downloads
References
Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N T., Olawo, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam-Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A. O. and Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11) e05312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312
Aisami, R. S. (2015). Learning styles and visual literacy for learning and performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, pp. 538-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.508
Almulla, M. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. Sage Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702
Asad, M.M., Naz, A., Churi, P. and Tahanzadeh, M.M. (2021). Virtual Reality as pedagogical tool to enhance experiential learning: A systematic literature review. Education Research International, 2021 (1), 7061623. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7061623
Bakri, F., Sunaryo., Irawan, V. F. and Muliyati, D. (2018). E-Learning model for Problem Based Learning on heat and thermodynamic topics in high school, JPPPF (Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika), 4(2). doi.org/10.21009/1.04207
Bhakti, Y. B., Sumarni, R. A., Mayanty, S. and Astuti, I. A. D. (2023). Developing virtual physics practicum module of optic based on guided inquiry to improve students' science process skills. Journal of Science and Science Education, 4 (1), pp. 39-49. https://doi.org/10.29303/jossed.v4i1.2329
Buchman, J. C. (2024). Enhancing critical thinking abilities through Project-Based Learning: effects and implementation. Asia-pacific Journal of Convergent Research Interchange, 10(9), pp. 545-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.47116/apjcri.2024.09.43
Bobek, E. and Teversky, B (2016). Creating visual explanations improves learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(27). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0031-6
Courey, K. A. and D. Lee, M. (2021). A model-based examination of scale effects in student evaluations of teaching. Sage Open, 7, pp. 26-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211040083
Criticos, C. (1996). Media selection. Plomp, T., & Ely, D. P. (Eds.): International Encyclopedia of Educational Technology, 2nd edition. New York: Elsevier Science, Inc.
Dalka, R. P., Sachmpazidi, D., Henderson, C. and Zwolak, J. P. (2022). Network analysis approach to likert-style surveys. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(2). 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020113
Farhodovna, A. M., Olimboevich, A, J. and Badriddinovich, K. B. (2020). Innovative pedogogical technologies for training the course of physics. The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research, 2(12). https://doi.org/10.37547/tajiir/Volume02Issue12-12
Haryadi, R., Vita, M., Utami, I. S., Ihsanudin, I., Setiani, Y. and Suher,an, A. (2019). Briquettes production as teaching aids physics for improving science process skills. International Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1157(032006). 10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032006
Karimovna, N. N., Izzatullaevna, T. Z. and Gayratovna, N. N. (2020). Innovative technologies in physics education. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 8(10), pp. 19-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106316
Ketut, S. K. & I Nyoman, T. A. P. (2020). Respon Siswa Terhadap Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Android. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 4(1). 10.23887/jpk.v4i1.24981
Mahdi, S. (2023). Effective communication in learning: teacher strategies and their impact on student learning outcomes. International Journal of Linguistics, Communication, and Broadcasting, 4(1), pp. 26-30. https://doi.org/10.46336/ijlcb.v1i4.26
Martinez-Borreguero, G., Naranjo-Correa, F. L. and Mateos-Núñez, M. (2022). Cognitive and emotional development of STEM skills in primary school teacher training through practical work. Education Sciences, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070470
Midroro, J., Prastowo, S. and Nuraini, L. (2021). Analisis respon siswa Sma Plus Al-Azhar Jember terhadap modul fisika digital berbasis articulate storyline 3 pokok bahasan Hukum Newton tentang gravitasi. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.19184/jpf.v10i1.23762
Njọkụ, C. P. U. (2015). Information and communication technologies to raise quality of teaching and learning in higher education institutions. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 11(1), pp. 122-147.
Obilor, E. I. (2019). Influence of teaching effectiveness on students’ learning outcome. International Journal of Innovative Social & Science Education Research, 7(2), pp. 37-48.
Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing teaching effectiveness and student learning outcomes. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), pp. 20-33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1060429.pdf
Sucahyo I., Rahmawati E. dan Hayati N, 2010, Pengembangan Bahan Ajar dan Media Pembelajaran Berupa Buku Elektronik untuk Mata Kuliah Elektronika Dasar I, Laporan Akhir Penelitian DIA-Bermutu TA 2010, Lemlit Unesa. Surabaya
Thees, M., Kapp, S., Strzys, M. P., Beil, F., Lukowicz, P. and Kuhn, J. (2020). Effects of augmented reality on learning and cognitive load in university physics laboratory courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106316
Yu, H. (2024). Enhancing creative cognition through project-based learning: An in-depth scholarly exploration. Heliyon, 10(6), e27706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27706
Abstract views: 46
,
PDF Downloads: 64



1.png)