An AHP-Based Priority Selection Method for Capabilities Development: A Case Study of SDN Botok
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jodic.v3n1.p38-50Keywords:
Analytical Hierarchy Process, Capabilities, Elementary School, Gap Analysis, StudentAbstract
The critical investment of the future society needed to develop student capabilities for the early stage. Research has contributes considerably to the investigation of necessary student capabilities for improvement. However, previous studies typically focus on proposing a general of capabilities. There is limited knowledge of how a school can identify the necessary of student capabilities and plan the corresponding development program actions. This research aims to determine the capabilities that need to be developed in Botok elementary school use Gap Analysis and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The method supports the analysis of any factors that influence by identify the actual condition, pre-test and post-test assessment of student capabilities in Botok elementary school. The gap analysis results are presented that linguistic and spatial-visual capabilities has excellent category. Meanwhile, the mathematics has good category. This result of gap analysis reinforced by AHP method, that are the eigenvector value of linguistic capabilities (0,20), mathematics capabilities (0,71), and spatial-visual capabilities (0,09). Thus, finding this research shows that the mathematics capabilities are the most important to develop.
Downloads
References
Abidin, Y., Mulyati, T., & Yunansah, H. (2017). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Literasi Berbasis Konsep Multiliterasi, Integratif, dan Berdiferensiasi (MID) di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(2), 156–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i2.13283
Ashcraft, M. H., & Kirk, E. P. (2001). The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.224
Atit, K., Power, J. R., Veurink, N., Uttal, D. H., Sorby, S., Panther, G., ... & Carr, M. (2020). Examining the role of spatial skills and mathematics motivation on middle school mathematics achievement. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00234-3
Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. 2012. Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11431010
Ferguson, A. M., Maloney, E. A., Fugelsang, J., & Risko, E. F. (2015). On the relation between math and spatial ability: The case of math anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215601438
Ganley, C. M., & Vasilyeva, M. (2011). Sex differences in the relation between math performance, spatial skills, and attitudes. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(4), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.04.001
Goenawan, S. I., & Wijayanti, S. H. (2018). Peningkatana Kemampuan Berhitung Metris di Sekolah Dasar Negeri Sekecamatan Cisauk, Tanggerang. Jurnal Abdimas, 22(2), 227–234. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/abdimas/article/view/8983/8748.
Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/749455
Heritage, M., & Heritage, J. (2013). Teacher questioning: The epicenter of instruction and assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(3), 176-190. doi: 10.1080/08957347.2013.793190
Khonitan, D., & Utami, B. N. (2018). Motivasi Generasi Muda Dalam Menyongsong Revolusi Industri 4.0 Melalui Pendidikan Bidang Pertanian Di Sekolah Tinggi Penyuluhan Pertanian Malang. Jurnal Sains Psikologi, 8(1), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.17977/um023v8i12019p162
Kleickmann, T., et al. 2013. Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112460398
Kok, P. J. (2021). The Relationship Between Pre-service Teachers’ Spatial Experience and Spatial Visualisation at a Rural-based University. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 25(1), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2021.1923884
Leitch, S. (2006). Prosperity for all in the global economy-world class skills. The Stationery Office.
Li, Y. (2014). International journal of STEM education – a platform to promote STEM education and research worldwide. International Journal of STEM Education, 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-7822-1-1
Li, Y. (2018a). Journal for STEM education research – promoting the development of interdisciplinary research in STEM education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1(1–2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-018-0009-z
Lowrie, T., Logan, T., & Ramful, A. (2017). Visuospatial training im- proves elementary students’ mathematics performance. British Journal of Educational Technology: Journal of the Council for Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12142
Lowrie, T., Logan, T., & Hegarty, M. (2019). The influence of spatial visualization training on students’ spatial reasoning and mathemat- ics performance. Journal of Cognition and Development.https://doi. org/10.1080/15248372.2019.1653298
Mix, K. S. (2019). Why are spatial skill and mathematics related?. Child Development Perspectives, 13(2), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12323
Mix, K. S., Levine, S. C., Cheng, Y. L., Young, C., Hambrick, D. Z., Ping, R., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2016). Separate but correlated: The latent structure of space and mathematics across development. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(9), 1206. https://psycnet.apa.org/manuscript/2016-41092-004.pdf
Musfiroh, T. 2008. Pengembangan Kecerdasan Majemuk. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
National Research Council, Division on Earth, Life Studies, Board on Earth Sciences, Geographical Sciences Committee, Committee on Support for Thinking Spatially, & The Incorporation of Geographic Information Science Across the K-12 Curriculum. (2005). Learning to think spatially. National Academies Press.
Olivia. 2008. Belajar Membaca yang Menyenangkan Untuk Anak Usia Dini. Jakarta: Alex Media Komputindo.
Olson, S., & Whitefoot, K. S. (Eds.). (2012). Making Value: Integrating Manufacturing, Design, and Innovation to Thrive in the Changing Global Economy: Summary of a Workshop. National Academies Press.
Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998. 0991
Pratiwi, H. (2020). Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process. Res. Gate, no. May, 1-33.
Saaty, T. L. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Saaty, T. L. 1994. Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 74(3), 426-447. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(94)90222-4.
Saaty, T. L. 2008. The analytical hierarchy process and analytical network measurement process: applications to decision under risk. European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 1(1), 122–196.
Sandroto, C. W., Riyanti, B. P. D., & Tri Warmiyati, M. (2018). Entrepreneurial Intention and Competencies of Vocational and High School Graduates in Indonesia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities.
Sorby, S. A. (1999). Developing 3-D spatial visualization skills. The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 63(2).
Suyadi. 2009. Permainan Edukatif yang Mencerdaskan. Jogjakarta: Power Books.
Syarief, R., & Djohar, S. (2014). Strategi Pengembangan Klaster Industri Rumput Laut yang Berkelanjutan di Kawasan Minapolitan Kabupaten Sumba Timur. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis, 11(3), 172-182.
Abstract views: 36
,
PDF Downloads: 12
1.png){kind=logo}
