SYMBOLIC INTERACTION OF GUMBREGAN TRADITIONS AS TRADITIONAL MEDIA IN THE MODERN ERA FOR THE COMMUNITY OF TUGGUNJAGIR VILLAGE, MANTUP DISTRICT, LAMONGAN DISTRICT

Authors

  • Sutrisno Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Awang Dharmawan Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/tc.v9i1.64556

Keywords:

Symbolic Interaction, Indonesian Communication System, Rural Communication, Gumbregan, Tunggunjagir Village

Abstract

Gumbregan is a tradition carried out in Tunggunjagir Village, Mantup District, Lamongan Regency. The gumbregan tradition is an expression of people's gratitude for the good fortune that has been given by Almighty God. The gumbregan tradition is a community ritual communication medium in preserving traditional culture that still survives in today's modern era. The aim of this research is to determine the symbolic interactions of the gumbregan tradition as a communication medium for the people of Tunggunjagir village. The Symbolic interaction theory approach, namely mind, self and society by George Herbet Mead was used to find the results of social phenomena that occurred in the Gumbregan tradition of the people of Tungungnjagir Village. This research is qualitative research with a case study method. Data was obtained from observations and in-depth interviews with informants. The results of this research produce (1) Mind, the people of Tungungnjagir Village think that the gumbregan tradition is a medium for community ritual communication. This communication is realized in the form of an expression of gratitude to God Almighty. (2) Self, people's view of themselves and the Gumbregan tradition contains motifs of artifacts, social existence, ideas of mutual cooperation and the formation of ideology and cultural values in society. (3) Society, In this concept, the gumbregan tradition is a projection of society's hopes for being able to raise livestock. Apart from that, there is also the influence of the Opinion Leader in implementing this tradition, namely as a provider of information and outreach to the public to follow this tradition.

 

Keywords: Symbolic Interaction, Indonesian Communication System, Rural Communication, Gumbregan, Tunggunjagir Village

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Endraswara, & Suwardi. (2012). Filsafat Sastra: Hakikat, Metodelogi dan Teori. Layar Kata.

Fibriyanti, W. (2019). Aktivitas Komunikasi Tradisi Gumbregan (Studi Etnografi Komunikasi Mengenai Aktivitas Komunikasi Tradisi Gumbregan dalam Memelihara Kesehatan dan Wujud Rasa Syukur Para Pertenak Sapi di Dusun Kuwon Gunungkidul Yogyakarta).

Geertz, C. (1983). Abangan, Santri, Priyayi dalam Masyarakat Jawa (2nd ed.). Djaya Pirusa.

Harahap, S. M., Siregar, F. A., & Harahap, D. (2022). Nilai-Nilai dan Praktik Moderasi Beragama Berbasis Kearifan Lokal di Sumatera Utara. Merdeka Kreasi Group.

Hasan, S. H. (2012). Pendidikan Sejarah untuk Memperkuat Pendidikan Karakter. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, 22(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/paramita.v22i1.1875

Hasanah, J., & Wisri, W. (2021). Interaksi Simbolik Tradisi Pandhaba di Situbondo. Maddah : Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Konseling Islam, 3(2), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.35316/maddah.v3i2.1336

Herfanda, A. Y. (2013). Sastra dalam Era Industri Kreatif. Makalah Disampaikan Dalam Kongres Bahasa Indonesia X, Pada Tanggal, 28–31.

Hindaryatiningsih, N. (2016). Model Proses Pewarisan Nilai-Nilai Budaya Lokal Dalam Tradisi Masyarakat Buton. Sosiohumaniora, 18(2), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v18i2.9944

Kinseng, R. A. (2017). Struktugensi: Sebuah Teori Tindakan. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 5(2), 127–137.

Koentjaraningrat. (2005). Pengantar Antropologi I. Rineka Cipta.

Koentjaraningrat. (2007). Sejarah Teori Antropologi I. UI Press.

Loudon, D. L., & Bitta, A. J. Della. (1993). Consumer Behavior: Concepts and Applications (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Marpaung, L. A. (2013). Urgensi Kearifan Lokal Membentuk Karakter Bangsa Dalam Rangka Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v2i2.10204

McQuail, D. (2000). McQuail ’ s Mass Communication Theory (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mulyana, D. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Notonegoro. (1974). Pancasila Dasar Filsafat Negara. Bhina Aksara.

Nurudin. (2004). Sistem Komunikasi Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Pradana, M. Y. A., Nisak, F., & Musyafiah, S. (2022). Interaksi Simbolik Agama dan Budaya dalam Tradisi Merti Desa di Dusun Ngaglik, Desa Seloprojo, Ngablak, Magelang. Islamic Insights Journal, 4(1), 43–55. https://islamicinsights.ub.ac.id/index.php/insights/article/view/74%0Ahttps://islamicinsights.ub.ac.id/index.php/insights/article/view/74/54

Prayitno, U. S., & Basundoro, P. (2015). Etnicity and Religion in Surabaya: Interaction of City Community in Symbolic Interactionism Perspective. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial , 6(2), 119–130.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan (kuantitatif, kualitatif, kombinasi, RnD, dan penelitian pendidikan) (3rd ed.). Alfabeta.

Sulastri, I., & Suharti, S. (2018). Sesaji Kupat Dalam Tradisi Gumbregan Di Desa Kemiri Kecamatan Tanjungsari Kabupaten Gunungkidul. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 22(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v22i1.19102

Sztompka, P. (2007). Sosiologi Perubahan Sosial. Pranada Media Group.

West, Richard, Turner, & H, L. (2008). Pengantar Teori Komunikasi Analisis dan Aplikasi. Salemba Humanika.

Widjaja, H. (2010). Otonomi Desa. Rajawali Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-28

How to Cite

Sutrisno, & Awang Dharmawan. (2024). SYMBOLIC INTERACTION OF GUMBREGAN TRADITIONS AS TRADITIONAL MEDIA IN THE MODERN ERA FOR THE COMMUNITY OF TUGGUNJAGIR VILLAGE, MANTUP DISTRICT, LAMONGAN DISTRICT. The Commercium, 9(1), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.26740/tc.v9i1.64556
Abstract views: 104 , PDF Downloads: 80