Kritik Atas Pandangan Inovasi-Kewirausahaan J. A. Schumpeter

  • Rijal Assidiq Mulyana IAIN SYEKH NURJATI
Keywords: Innovation, Entrepreneurship, J. A. Schumpeter

Abstract

Schumpeter is one of the 20th century economists who laid brilliant ideas about entrepreneurship. He placed innovation as the soul of entrepreneurship. An individual is considered an entrepreneur when they have made innovation through new combinations that include several things, such as new products, new production methods, new markets, new sources of supply, and more effective organizational management. This study aims to conduct a critical review and commentary on Schumpeter's ideas. In practice, Schumpeter's ideas about innovation have limitations. The author sees these limitations in several aspects: 1. The innovation Schumpeter referred to may only occur in established industries or those with strong economic capital, meaning that innovation only occurs among large-scale business players, but in practice, entrepreneurs do not necessarily have large-scale business operations from the beginning. 2. Schumpeter emphasizes the functions of innovation too much but overlooks the potential risks that business players may face when carrying out innovative functions. 3. Business players who manage their business, business products, production methods with traditional and outdated mindsets and methods may emerge, and these types of business players cannot be recognized based on Schumpeter's theory.

References

Afuah, A. (2003). INNOVATION MANAGEMENT Strategies, Implementation, and Profits. Oxford University Press.

Alfansyur, A., & Mariyani. (2020). Seni Mengelola Data : Penerapan Triangulasi Teknik , Sumber Dan Waktu pada Penelitian Pendidikan Sosial. HISTORIS: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Sejarah, 5(2), 146–150.

Astrachan, J. H., & Jaskiewicz, P. (2008). Emotional Returns and Emotional Costs in Privately Held Family Businesses: Advancing Traditional Business Valuation. Family Business Review, 21(2), 139–149.

Boutillier, S. (2019). Small entrepreneurship, knowledge and social resources in a heavy industrial territory. The Case of Eco-Innovations in Dunkirk, North of France. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10, 997-1018.

Bovey, W. H., & Hede, A. (2001). Resistance to organisational change: the role of defence mechanisms. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(7), 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006166

Bruce, D. (2002). Taxes and Entrepreneurial Endurance: Evidence from the Self-Employed. National Tax Journal, 55(1), 5–24.

Callegari, B., & Nybakk, E. (2022). Schumpeterian theory and research on forestry innovation and entrepreneurship: The state of the art, issues and an agenda. Forest Policy and Economics, 138, 102720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102720

Chatzinikolaou, D., & Vlados, C. (2019). Schumpeter, Neo-Schumpeterianism, and Stra.Tech.Man Evolution of the Firm. Issues in Economics and Business, 5(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.5296/ieb.v5i2.16097

Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 354–363. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010

Cowdrey, R. (2012). Creating an Entrepreneurial Mindset: Failure Is an Option (1st ed.). Bookboon.com.

Dibrov, A. (2015). Innovation resistance : the main factors and ways to overcome them. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.489

Fitrah, N., Mohd, B., Mui, D., Kee, H., Chong, L. M., & Han, J. (2020). The Impact of Innovation Strategy on Organizational Success : A Study of Samsung. 3(2), 93–104.

Foy, S., & Gruber, M. (2022). Identity–Society (Mis)Alignment and the Instrumentalization of Firm Creation: Creative Destruction and Creative Reconstruction. Academy of Management Journal, 65(2), 479–515. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.0754

Fragio, A. (2022). The Crisis of the Historical Style of Economic Reasoning: Joseph A. Schumpeter, Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, and Paul A. Samuelson (pp. 53–68). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94586-2_4

Garnaut, R. (2022). Economic Ideas and Policy Outcomes: Applications to Climate and Energy. June. https://rse.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/2022-07/Gruen Lecture 2022 %28final%29 - Garnaut - June 29.pdf

Gray, C. (2002). Entrepreneurship, Resistance to Change and Growth in Small Firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 9(1), 61–72.

Hamilton, B. H. (2000). "Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment. Journal of Political Economy, 108(3), 604–631.

Hernández-Sánchez, B. R., Cardella, G. M., & Sánchez-García, J. C. (2020). Psychological factors that lessen the impact of covid-19 on the self-employment intention of business administration and economics’ students from latin america. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155293

Kao, R. W. (1995). "WHY ENTREPRENEURSHIP COULD BE TAUGHT AND SHOULD BE TAUGHT, INCLUDING AN INTRODUCTION TO A MODEL FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 12(4), 97–99.

Kim, H. (2020). Analysis of How Tesla Creates Core Innovation Capability. 15(6), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v15n6p42

Knopf, J. W. (2006). Doing a Literature Review. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39(1), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096506060264

Lambert, T. E., & Velardo, T. (2020). Schumpeter, Sweezy, the Financial System, and Innovation: Small versus Big Business. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 13(3), 447–466.

Lipieta, A., & Lipieta, A. (2022a). The role of destructive mechanisms within economic evolution. Panoeconomicus, 00, 8–8. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN190729008L

Lipieta, A., & Lipieta, A. (2022b). Adjustment Processes Within Economic Evolution — Schumpeterian Approach. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00912-3

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). Communist Manifesto - Intro and Part I. 1–9.

McCraw, T. K. (2009). Prophet of innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and creative destruction. Harvard University Press.

Mulyana, R. A. (2013). Pengaruh Norma Subyektif, Persepsi Kontrol Perilaku, Dan Sikap Wirausaha terhadap Minat Berwirausaha Siswa SMK [Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia]. http://repository.upi.edu/2616/

OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. In The Measurement of Scientific; Technological and Innovation Activities.

Pettit, P. (2017). Democracy Before, In, and After Schumpeter. Critical Review, 29(4), 492–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2017.1378401

Piano, N. (2017). “Schumpeterianism” Revised: The Critique of Elites in Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Critical Review, 29(4), 505–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2017.1458501

Piano, N. (2022). Neoliberalism, leadership, and democracy: Schumpeter on “Schumpeterian” theories of entrepreneurship. European Journal of Political Theory, 21(4), 715–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885120960439

Podolny, M. J. (2020). How Apple Is Organized for Innovation. Harvard Business Review, December, 1–11.

Putu, N., Nurjani, S., Ketut, N., & Dwijendra, A. (2020). How Traditional Balinese Houses Can Adjust and Cater for International Tourist in the Canggu Area , Bali Indonesia ? 24(03), 2561–2573. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I3/PR201901

Rosenberg, N. (2011). Was Schumpeter a Marxist? Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(4), 1215–1222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr037

Sánchez, I. R., Williams, A. M., & Andreu, H. G. (2019). Customer Resistance to Tourism Innovations: Entrepreneurs’ Understanding and Management Strategies. Journal of Travel Research, 59(3), 450–464.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). The Creative Response in Economic History. The Journal of Economic History, 7(2), 149-159.

Schumpeter, J. A. (2013). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203202050

Schumpeter, J. A. (2017). The Theory of Economic Development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315135564

Sholahudin, U. (2020). Membedah Teori Kritis Mazhab Frankfurt. Jurnal of Urban Sociology, 3(2), 71–89. www.journal.uwks.ac.id/index.php/sosiologi

Skrodzka, I. (2016). Knowledge-based economy in the European Union–Cross-country analysis. Statistics in Transition. New Series, 17(2), 281–294.

Sombart, W. (1913). Studien zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des modernen Kapitalismus: Bd. Krieg und Kapitalismus. Duncker & Humblot, 2.

Stam, E. (2018). An Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Approach to Industrial Policy. USE Working Paper Series, 18(5), 13.

Suwarno, D. J., & Silvianita, A. (2017). Knowledge Sharing Dan Inovasi Pada Industri Startup. Ecodemica, 1(1), 98–106.

Thomas, G. (2017). Can Liberal Democracy Survive Capitalism? Critical Review, 29(4), 530–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2017.1443592

Widyapuspita, N., Hartanti, N. ., & Rahma, N. (2020). Redefining the concept of Tri Mandala cosmology in the spatial organization of resort hotel in Bali Redefining the concept of Tri Mandala cosmology in the spatial organization of resort hotel in Bali. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/780/1/012074

Williams, A. M., Rodríguez Sánchez, I., & Škokić, V. (2021). Innovation, Risk, and Uncertainty: A Study of Tourism Entrepreneurs. Journal of Travel Research, 60(2), 293–311.

Williamson, P. J. (2010). Cost Innovation: Preparing for a ‘Value-for-Money’ Revolution. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 343–353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.008
Published
2023-09-04
How to Cite
Mulyana, R. (2023). Kritik Atas Pandangan Inovasi-Kewirausahaan J. A. Schumpeter. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi (JUPE), 11(3), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.26740/jupe.v11n3.p243-253
Section
Articles
Abstract Views: 210
PDF Downloads: 261