ANALYSIS OF TEACHER AND STUDENT RESPONSES TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FULL DAY SCHOOL SYSTEM IN THE LIGHT VEHICLE ENGINEERING EXPERTISE PROGRAM AT SMKN 1 KEBONSARI MADISON

  • Jhordan Yoga Tictha UNESA
  • Wahyu Dwi Kurniawan Universitas Negeri Surabaya
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jptm.v13n02.p168-172

Abstract

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the response of teachers and students to the full day school program in Light Vehicle Engineering expertise at SMKN 1 Kebonsari. The type of research used is Quantitative Descriptive which refers to data analysis techniques that use descriptive analysis. This study concluded that the teacher's response from the analysis of the distribution of questionnaires got a result of 77% in the category of strongly agreeing while the results of distributing questionnaires to students got a result of 75%, included in the category of agreeing. From these two results it can be concluded that the full day school program in the light vehicle engineering expertise program at SMKN 1 Kebonsari gets a good response from teachers and students.

Keywords: Full Day School, Descriptive Analysis, Student Response, Teacher Response.

References

1. Andesta Bujuri, Dian. 2018. Analisis Perkembangan Kognitif Anak Usia Dasar dan Implikasinya dalam Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar. Yogyakarta: Jurnal Tidak Diterbitkan, Vol. XI. No. 1.
2. Apriyani, A., Fatimah, N., & Wicaksono, H. 2018. Dari Full Day School ke Kebijakan enam hari Sekolah: Rasionalisasi Praktik dan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pasca Full Day School di SMA Negeri 1 Kedungreja Kabupaten Cilacap. (online).
3. Erda, E. S., Suciati, S., & Iswahyudi, D. 2019. Implementasi Full Day School Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Kelas X. (online).
4. Grahitno, Wicaksono Anggit. 2017. Fenomena Full Day School DDalam Sistem Pendidikan Indonesia. (online).
5. Hasanah, Uswatun. 2020. Peran Orangtua Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Agama Anak Di Dusun Penagan Jaya Desa Penagan Ratu Kabupaten Lampung Utara.(online) https://repository.metrouniv.ac.id.
6. Idrus, L. 2019. Evaluasi Dalam Prses Pembelajaran. Vol. 9, No. 2. (online) https://jurnal.iain-bone.ac.id.
7. Kusaeri. 2012. Pengukuran Dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
8. Lutfiyak, Muh Fitrah. 2017. Metodologi Penelitian: Penelitian Kualitatif, Tindakan Kelas & Studi Kasus. Sukabumi: CV Jejak.
9. Pujihastuti, Isti. 2010. Prinsip Penulisan Kuesioner Penelitian. Vol. 2 No. 1. (online).
10. Rohana, Homsa Diyah. 2017. Pengaruh Sistem Full Day School Terhadap Pembentukan Karakter Religius Siswa Kelas V Di SD Nasima Semarang. (online). http://lib.unnes.ac.id /id/eprint/29555.
11. Sudjana, N. & Ibrahim. 2004. Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan Cetakan Ketiga. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.
12. Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta
13. UNESA. (2014). Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi Universitas Negeri Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Published
2024-07-04
Issue
Vol 13 No 02 (2024): JPTM. Volume 13 No. 2 Tahun 2024
Section
Pendidikan Teknik Mesin
Abstract Views: 0