PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM SOLVING VIRTUAL LABORATORY DENGAN KEMAMPUAN SCIENTIFIC WRITING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN LITERASI SAINS SISWA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v11n1.p57-64Keywords:
problem solving, problem solving virtual laboratory, scientific writing, literasi sainsAbstract
Pembelajaran kimia melibatkan siswa dalam praktik sains di dalam kelas maupun laboratorium. Pembelajaran online telah menjadi kebutuhan dunia pendidikan sejak pandemi Covid melanda dunia. Praktikum virtual dibutuhkan untuk menunjang pembelajaran. Penelitian ini bertujuan melihat efektivitas pembelajaran problem solving virtual laboratory dengan scientific writing untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi siswa. Desain penelitian adalah quasi experiment pretest-postest control group. Sampel penelitian adalah 140 siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri di Indonesia. 70 siswa di kelompok eksperimen menggunakan pembelajaran problem solving virtual laboratory dengan scientific writing; dan 70 siswa di kelompok kontrol dengan pembelajaran tanpa eksperimen virtual. Instrumen penelitian adalah tes literasi sains dengan 7 item yang telah divalidasi dan nilai reliabilitas Alpha Cronbach’s sebesar 0.869. Data dianalisis dengan ANCOVA, karena data penelitian terdistribusi normal dan homogen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran problem solving virtual laboratory dengan scientific writing berhasil meningkatkan kemampuan literasi sains siswa secara signifikan dengan nilai efek size sebesar 0.748. Analisis deskriptif hasil post-test memperlihatkan bahwa jumlah siswa yang mencapai level tinggi pada kelas eksperimen (54.29%) lebih banyak bila dibandingkan dengan siswa pada kelas kontrol (19.41%). Implikasi penelitian ini adalah pembelajaran kimia perlu mengintegrasikan eksperimen virtual dan melatih kemampuan scientific writing untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi sains siswa.
Downloads
References
Cavas, B., Cavas, P., Ozdem, Y., Rannikmae, M., & Ertepinar, H. 2012. Research Trends in Science Education from the Education from the Perspective of Journal of Baltic Science Education: A Content Analysis from 2002 to 2011. Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol 11, No 1, pp. 94-103.
OECD. 2016. Country Note-Results from PISA 2015: Indonesia. In OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2015-Indonesia.pdf. Diakses tanggal 07 Agustus 2021.
Laksono, P. J. 2018. Studi Kemampuan Literasi Kimia Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia Pada Materi Pengelolaan Limbah. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, Vol 2, No 1, pp. 1-12.
Saija, M., & Namakule, U. 2019. Profil Kemampuan Literasi Kimia Siswa SMA Negeri 3 Ambon. Jurnal Kiprah, Vol 7, No 2, pp. 31-38.
Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. 2005. The Importance Of Involving High-School Chemistry Teachers In The Process Of Defining The Operational Meaning Of ‘Chemical Literacy’. International Journal of Science Teaching, Vol 27, pp. 323-344.
Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A. S., & Nicolich, M. 2014. Developing a Measure of Scientific Literacy for Middle School Students. Science Education, Vol 98, No 4, pp. 549-580.
Imani, H. A., Ika, M. S., Purwanto. 2016. Profil Literasi Sains Siswa SMP di Kota Bandung terkait Tema Pemanasan Global. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM, 1, 242-248. Retrieved from http://pasca.um.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Hajar-Adha-242-248.pdf.
Basilaia, G., Dgebuadze, M., Kantaria, M., & Chokhonelidze, G. 2020. Replacing The Classic Learning Form At Universities As An Immediate Response To The COVID-19 Virus Infection In Georgia. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, Vol 8, No 3, pp. 101-108.
Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. 2020. Transition To Online Education In Schools During A SARS-CoV- 2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, Vol 5, No 4, pp. 1-9.
Chen, J., Qi, T., Liu, L., Ling, Y., Qian, Z., Li, T., & Song, Z. 2020. Clinical Progression Of Patients With COVID-19 in Shanghai, China. Journal of Infection, Vol 80, No 5, pp. 1-6.
Dhawan, S. 2020. Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Education Technology Systems,Vol 49, No 1, pp. 5-22.
Zhu, X., & Liu, J. 2020. Education in and After Covid-19: Immediate Responses and Long-Term Visions. Postdigital Science and Education,Vol 2, No 3, pp. 695-699.
Hermanto, Y., & Srimulyani, V. A. 2021. The Challenges of Online Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic Jurnal Pendidikan & Pengajaran, Vol 54, No 1, pp. 46-57.
Simarmata, J., Hamid, M. A., Ramadhani, R., Chamidah, D., Simanihuruk, L., Safitri, M., Napitupulu, D., & Iqbal, M. 2020, Pendidikan Di Era Revolusi4.0: Tuntutan, Kompetensi & Tantangan. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Deng, Y., Kelly, G. J., & Xiao, L. 2019. The Development Of Chinese Undergraduate Students’ Competence Of Scientific Writing In The Context Of An Advanced Organic Chemistry Experiment Course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, Vol 20, No 1, pp. 270-287.
Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S., & Rustaman, A. 2011. Membangun Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Bandung: Humaniora.
Deng, Y., Kelly, G. J., & Deng, S. 2019. The Influences Of Integrating Reading, Peer Evaluation, And Discussion On Undergraduate Students’ Scientific Writing. International Journal of Science Education, Vol 41, No 10, pp. 1408-1433.
Stafford-Brizard, K. B., Cantor, P., & Rose, L. T. 2017. Building The Bridge Between Science And Practice: Essential Characteristics Of A Translational Framework. Mind, Brain, and Education, Vol 11, No 4, pp. 155-165.
Stroupe, D. 2015. Describing “science practice” in learning settings. Science Education, Vol 99, No 6, pp. 1033-1040.
Chen, Y. C., Hand, B., & McDowell, L. 2013. The Effects Of Writing-To-Learn Activities On Elementary Students’ Conceptual Understanding: Learning About Force And Motion Through Writing To Older Peers. Science Education, Vol 97, No 5, pp. 745-771.
Kiuhara, S., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. 2009. Teaching Writing To High School Students: A National Survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol 101, No 1, pp. 136-160.
Yore, L., Bisanz, G., & Hand, B. 2003. Examining The Literacy Component Of Science Literacy: 25 Years Of Language Arts And Science Research. International Journal of Science Education, Vol 25, No 6, pp. 689-725.
Muhajir, S. N., Mahen, E. C. S., Yuningsih, E. K., & Rochman, C. 2015. Implementasi Model Problem Solving Laboratory untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Fisika Dasar II. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains 2015 (SNIPS 2015). Bandung : 8 & 9 Juni.
Simatupang, H., Aryeni, & Purnama, S. 2017. Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa Melalui Penerapan Model Problem Solving Laboratory Pada Matakuliah Praktikum Biologi Sistem, Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, Vol 5, No 2, pp. 077-083.
Supahar, & Widodo, E. 2020. The Effect of Virtual Laboratory Application of Problem-Based Learning Model to Improve Science Literacy and Problem-Solving Skills. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (Vol 528, pp. 633-640). Atlantis Press.
Rembulan, C. N., & Susanti, L. Y. 2021. The Effect of Virtual Laboratory Implementation on The Science Literacy Ability of Class VIII Students on Material Force and Movement of Objects at MTs Negeri 1 Jember. Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal, Vol 2, No 1, pp. 74-86.
Başer, M., & Durmuş, S. 2010. The Effectiveness of Computer Supported Versus Real Laboratory Inquiry Learning Environments on the Understanding of Direct Current Electricity among Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Vol 6, No 1, pp. 47-61.
Ismail, I., Permanasari, A., & Setiawan, W. 2016. Efektivitas Virtual Lab Berbasis STEM Dalam Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa Dengan Perbedaan Gender. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, Vol 2, No 2, pp. 190-201.
Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th Ed. USA: SAGE Publication Inc.
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. 2003. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions 3rd Ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
OECD. 2016. PISA 2015 Assesment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy. Paris: PISA-OECD Publishing.
Holbrook, J., Laius, A., & Rannikmäe, M. 2003. The Influence of Social Issue-Based Science Teaching Materials On Students’ Creativity. University of Tartu, Estonian Ministery of Education.
Hitipeuw, I. 2009. Belajar & Pembelajaran. Malang: Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang
Solissa, D. M., & Saija, M. 2017. Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Problem Solving untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas X SMA Negeri 2 Kecamatan Sirimau Kota Ambon. Jurnal Pedagogika dan Dinamika Pendidikan, Vol 5, No 2, pp. 133-144.
Ogunsolu, O. O., Wang, J. C., & Hanson, K. Writing a Review Article: A Graduate Level Writing Class. Journal of Chemical Education, Vol 95, No 5, pp. 810-816.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Keith, M. 2018. Research Methods in Education, 8th Ed. New York: Routledge.
Fitriyanto, F., Nurhayati, S., & Saptorini. 2012. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Pada Materi Larutan Penyangga dan Hidrolisis.Chemistry in Education, Vol 1, No 1, pp. 40-44.
Ismail, I., Permanasari, A., & Setiawan, W. 2016. STEM Virtual Lab: An Alternative Practical Media to Enhance Student’s Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, Vol 5, No 2, pp. 239-246.
Totiana, F., VH Susanti, E., & Redjeki, T. 2012. Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving (CPS) Yang Dilengkapi Media Pembelajaran Laboratorium Virtual Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Pokok Koloid Kelas XI IPA Semester Genap SMA Negeri 1 Karanganyar. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, Vol 1, No 1, pp. 74-79.
Laila, S. I., & Anggaryani, M. 2021. The Use of STEM-Based Virtual Laboratory (PhET) of Newton’s Law to Improve Students’ Problem Solving Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, Vol 9, No 2, pp. 125-133.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The license terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) requires attribution to the original creator, permits non-commercial use, and does not allow for the application of legal or technological restrictions on others' use.
Abstract views: 308
,
PDF Downloads: 260
