OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF CHATGPT IN CHEMISTRY: NARRATIVES OF PHILIPPINE PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v15n1.p54-66Keywords:
redox reactions, ChatGPT in chemistry, chemistry content analysis, ethical AI in educationAbstract
Chemistry, especially redox chemistry, has always presented complex challenges to learners as it expects them to work at several different levels of representation and to connect abstract electron transfer processes to actual phenomena in the real world. These obstacles are compounded in pre-service teachers by the fact that they have to master disciplinary material and at the same time, start forming their own professional pedagogical identities. The study examined how twenty-five first-year teacher education students in a Philippine state university interacted with the ChatGPT as a preparatory intervention to learn the redox reactions and how these perceptions were reflected in their written responses to determine the cognitive and professional consequences of such experience. Using qualitative content analysis, six interrelated themes were generated that describe how students experienced ChatGPT as a learning scaffold, its conceptual affordances, perceived limitations, and its implications for their emerging professional identities. The findings suggest that the use of ChatGPT as a self-directed inquiry and contextualized learning scaffold is valuable, but it requires critical assessment and careful incorporation to avoid misconceptions and overdependence. For teacher education, the research explains that in order to make AI literate, teacher education should also be subject mastery that would enable future teachers to use generative AI in a responsible manner and maintain the human-centered, relational, and ethical aspects of teaching that cannot be technologically-enhanced.
Downloads
References
Bugarso, J. M. S., Arcenas, G. L., Galigao, J. M., and Camarao, M. K. G. 2023. Difficulty of Science Pre-Service Teachers in their Major Courses (Physics, Biology, Chemistry, Earth Science). Indonesian J. Multidic. Res., Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 145–154.
Gocotano, T. E., Jerodiaz, M. A. L., Banggay, J. C. P., Nasibog, H. B. R., and Go, M. B. 2021. Higher Education Students’ Challenges on Flexible Online Learning Implementation in the Rural Areas: A Philippine Case. IJLTER, Vol. 20, No. 7, pp. 262–290.
Hamerská, L., Matěcha, T., Tóthová, M., and Rusek, M. 2024. Between Symbols and Particles: Investigating the Complexity of Learning Chemical Equations. Education Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 570.
Nakiboglu, C., Rahayu, S., Nakiboğlu, N., and Treagust, D. F. 2024. Exploring Senior High-School Students’ Understanding of Electrochemical concepts: patterns of Thinking Across Turkish and Indonesian Contexts. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 42–61.
Ngendabanga, C., Nkurunziza, J. B., and Mugabo, L. R. 2025. Innovative Approaches in Chemistry Teaching: A Systematic Review on the Use of Improvised Chemicals for Student Engagement and Performance. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 566–577.
Lubis, E. L. S. 2024. Diagnostic and Analysis Misconceptions in Learning Redox and Electrochemistry Topic in Chemistry Students. LAVOISIER, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 50–63.
Wu, M.-Y. M., and Yezierski, E. J. 2023. Investigating the Mangle of Teaching Oxidation–Reduction with the VisChem Approach: Problematising Symbolic Traditions that Undermine Chemistry Concept Development. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 807–827.
Reyes, R. L., and Regala, J. D. 2025. Reimagining the Philosophy of Experimentation in Chemistry Education: Embracing AI as a Tool for Scientific Inquiry. Sci. & Educ.
Ortencio, F. J., Golangayan, K. R., and Fuyonan, E. 2025. Learning Challenges and Coping Strategies in Chemistry Among STEM and Non-STEM Students in the Bachelor of Secondary Education major in Science (BSEd-Science) Program: A Phenomenological Study. ASEAN Journal for Science Education, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 113–130.
Akaygun, S., and Kilic, I. 2025. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) as the Artist of Chemistry Visuals: Chemistry Preservice Teachers’ Reflections on Visuals Created by GenAI. J. Chem. Educ., Vol. 102, No. 7, pp. 2549–2564.
Yuriev, E., Burton, M. G., Knott, D., Terrill, A. E., Jackson, N. R. C., and Chen, S. 2025. Integrating Generative AI in Chemistry Education: Enhancing Career-Ready Writing Skills in Pharmaceutical Science. J. Chem. Educ., Vol. 102, No. 5, pp. 1991–2001.
Arndt, H. 2023. AI and Education: An Investigation into the Use of ChatGPT for Systems Thinking. arXiv.
Choi, Y. 2025. Exploring the Scientific Validity of ChatGPT’s Responses in Elementary Science for Sustainable Education. Sustainability, Vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 2962.
Magnone, K. Q., and Yezierski, E. J. 2024. Applying the VisChem Approach in High School Classrooms: Chemical Learning Outcomes and Limitations. J. Chem. Educ., Vol. 101, No. 3, pp. 727–740.
Adeyele, V. O., and Ramnarain, U. 2024. Exploring the Integration of ChatGPT in Inquiry-based Learning: Teacher Perspectives. IJTE, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 200–217.
Kotsis, K. T. 2024. Integrating ChatGPT into the Inquiry-Based Science Curriculum for Primary Education. EJEDU, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 28–34.
Li, P.-H., Lee, H.-Y., Lin, C.-J., Wang, W.-S., and Huang, Y.-M. 2025. InquiryGPT: Augmenting ChatGPT for Enhancing Inquiry-Based Learning in STEM Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 62, No. 8, pp. 1937–1966.
Ruff, E. F., Franz, J. L., and West, J. K. 2024. Using ChatGPT for Method Development and Green Chemistry Education in Upper-Level Laboratory Courses. J. Chem. Educ., Vol. 101, No. 8, pp. 3224–3232.
Araújo, J. L., and Saúde, I. 2024. Can ChatGPT Enhance Chemistry Laboratory Teaching? Using Prompt Engineering to Enable AI in Generating Laboratory Activities. J. Chem. Educ., Vol. 101, No. 5, pp. 1858–1864.
Tan, X., Cheng, G., and Ling, M. H. 2025. Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Teacher Professional Development: A Systematic Review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 8, pp. 100355.
Zhang, J., and Zhang, Z. 2024. AI in Teacher Education: Unlocking New Dimensions in Teaching Support, Inclusive Learning, and Digital Literacy. Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 1871–1885.
Beege, M., Hug, C., and Nerb, J. 2024. AI in STEM Education: The Relationship between Teacher Perceptions and ChatGPT Use. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, Vol. 16, pp. 100494.
Daher, R. 2025. Integrating AI literacy into Teacher Education: A Critical Perspective Paper. Discov. Artif. Intell., Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 217.
Hur, J. W. 2025. Fostering AI Literacy: Overcoming Concerns and Nurturing Confidence among Preservice Teachers. ILS, Vol. 126, No. 1/2, pp. 56–74.
Uçar, S.-Ş., Lopez-Gazpio, I., and Lopez-Gazpio, J. 2025. Evaluating and Challenging the Reasoning Capabilities of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Technology-Assisted Chemistry Education. Educ. Inf. Technol., Vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 11463–11482.
Yan, L., Sha, L., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Chen, G., Li, X., Jin, Y., and Gašević, D. 2024. Practical and Ethical Challenges of Large Language Models in Education: A Systematic Scoping Review. Brit. J. Educational Tech., Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 90–112.
Ramnarain, U., Ogegbo, A. A., Penn, M., Ojetunde, S., and Mdlalose, N. 2024. Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Intention to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence in Inquiry-Based Teaching. J. Sci. Educ. Technol., Vol. 34, pp. 1272–1285.
Fulsher, A., Pagkratidou, M., and Kendeou, P. 2025. GenAI and Misinformation in education: A Systematic Scoping Review of Opportunities and Challenges. AI & Society.
Kleinheksel, A. J., Rockich-Winston, N., Tawfik, H., and Wyatt, T. R. 2020. Demystifying Content Analysis. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Vol. 84, No. 1, pp. 7113.
Elo, S., and Kyngäs, H. 2008. The Qualitative Content Analysis Process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 107–115.
Educational Researcher. 2011. AERA Code of Ethics: American Educational Research Association Approved by the AERA Council. Educational Researcher, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 145–156.
American Psychological Association. 2002. Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. American Psychologist, Vol. 57, No. 12, pp. 1060–1073.
Patac, L. P., and Patac, A. V. 2025. Using ChatGPT for Academic Support: Managing Cognitive Load and Enhancing Learning Efficiency – A Phenomenological Approach. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, Vol. 11, pp. 101301.
Gunbatar, S. A., Sirin, G. T., Ilkyaz, O. C., and Mutlu, Y. 2025. Exploring the Artificial Intelligence Interaction Profiles of Participants with Different Levels of Teaching Experience for Lesson Planning in the Context of Acids and Bases. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 977–995.
Iyamuremye, A., Niyonzima, F. N., Mukiza, J., Twagilimana, I., Nyirahabimana, P., Nsengimana, T., Habiyaremye, J. D., Habimana, O., and Nsabayezu, E. 2024. Utilization of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Chemistry Education: A Critical Review. Discover Education, Vol. 3, No. 95.
Huang, Y.-S., Wu, W.-T., Wu, P.-H., and Teng, Y.-J. 2024. Investigating the Impact of Integrating Prompting Strategies in ChatGPT on Students Learning Achievement and Cognitive Load. Innovative Technologies and Learning, Cheng, Y.-P., Pedaste, M., Bardone, E., and Huang, Y.-M., Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 14785. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 3–11.
Lee, H.-Y., Chen, P.-H., Wang, W.-S., Huang, Y.-M., and Wu, T.-T. 2024. Empowering ChatGPT with Guidance Mechanism in Blended Learning: Effect of self-Regulated Learning, Higher-Order Thinking Skills, and Knowledge Construction. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High Educ., Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 16.
Zuo, M., Kong, S., Ma, Y., Hu, Y., and Xiao, M. 2023. The Effects of Using Scaffolding in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Education Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 705.
Lasmawan, I. W., and Budiarta, I. W. 2020. Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development and The Students’ Progress in Learning (A Heutagogcal Bibliographical Review). J. Pendidik. Indonesia, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 545.
Antonio, R., and Prudente, M. 2021. Effectiveness of Metacognitive Instruction on Students’ Science Learning Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. IJonSE, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 43–54.
Chen, H.-L. S. 2023. Systemic Approach Toward Teacher Professional Development for Curriculum Reform and Pedagogical Innovation in Taiwan: An Insider’s Reflective Tale. International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific, Lee, W. O., Brown, P., Goodwin, A. L., and Green, A., Eds., Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, pp. 1–21.
Dillon, T. 2024. Korean University Students’ Prompt Literacy Training with ChatGPT: Investigating Language Learning Strategies. English Teaching, Vol. 79, No. 3, pp. 123–157.
Boyer, S. L., Edmondson, D. R., Artis, A. B., and Fleming, D. 2014. Self-Directed Learning: A Tool for Lifelong Learning. Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 20–32.
Toh, W., and Kirschner, D. 2020. Self-Directed Learning in Video Games, Affordances and Pedagogical Implications for Teaching and Learning. Computers & Education, Vol. 154, pp. 103912.
Darwin, D., Rusdin, N., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, E. D., Laksmi, and Marzuki. 2024. Critical Thinking in the AI Era: An Exploration of EFL Students’ Perceptions, Benefits, and Limitations. Cogent Education, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 2290342.
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., and Li, L. D. 2024. The Effects of Over-Reliance on AI Dialogue Systems on Students’ Cognitive Abilities: A Systematic Review. Smart Learn. Environ., Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 28.
Çelik, F., and Baturay, M. H. 2024. Technology and Innovation in Shaping the Future of Education. Smart Learn. Environ., Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 54.
Ukwandu, E., Omisade, O., Jones, K., Thorne, S., and Castle, M. 2025. The Future of Teaching and Learning in the Context of Emerging Artificial Intelligence Technologies. Futures, Vol. 171, pp. 103616.
Hallal, K., Hamdan, R., and Tlais, S. 2023. Exploring the Potential of AI-Chatbots in Organic Chemistry: An Assessment of ChatGPT and Bard. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 5, pp. 100170.
Beier, J. P., Swart, M. I., Pazicni, S., and Nathan, M. J. 2024. Connecting Chemistry Understanding: An Integrated Framework for Concretizing Abstract Visual Representations. 18th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2024, pp. 242–249.
Scharlott, L. J., Rippey, D. W., Rosa, V., and Becker, N. M. 2024. Progression toward Causal Mechanistic Reasoning through Phenomenon-Based Learning in Introductory Chemistry. J. Chem. Educ., Vol. 101, No. 3, pp. 777–788.
Kökver, Y., Pektaş, H. M., and Çelik, H. 2025. Artificial Intelligence Applications in Education: Natural Language Processing in Detecting Misconceptions. Educ. Inf. Technol., Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 3035–3066.
Alejandro, I. M. V., Sanchez, J. M. P., Sumalinog, G. G., Mananay, J. A., Goles, C. E., and Fernandez, C. B. 2024. Pre-Service Teachers’ Technology Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Applications in Education. STEM Education, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 445–465.
Malacapay, M. 2025. AI Literacy, Preparedness, and Use Motives of Elementary Education Pre-Service Teachers of A State University in the Philippines. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Vol. 9, No. 9, pp. 1120–1136.
Espartinez, A. S. 2025. Between Innovation and Tradition: A Narrative Inquiry of Students’ and Teachers’ Experiences with ChatGPT in Philippine Higher Education. Social Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 359.
Kaminskienė, L., Järvelä, S., and Lehtinen, E. 2022. How Does Technology Challenge Teacher Education? Int. J. Educ. Technol. High Educ., Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 64.
Sancho-Gil, J. M., Rivera-Vargas, P., and Miño-Puigcercós, R. 2020. Moving Beyond the Predictable Failure of Ed-Tech Initiatives. Learning, Media and Technology, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 61–75.
Mangubat, R., Calasang, V., Espina, R., Capuyan, D., Gamusa, E., Pernaa, J., Acut, D., and Garcia, M. 2025. Understanding the Role of Technological Self-Efficacy in Fostering Creative Problem-Solving and Curiosity in Teacher Education: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. J. Technol. Sci. Educ., Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 456–478.
Dayagbil, F. T., Boholano, H. B., and Sumalinog, G. G. 2025. Are They in or Out? Exploring Pre-Service Teachers’ Knowledge, Perceptions, and Experiences Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Teaching and Learning. Front. Educ., Vol. 10, pp. 1665205.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 UNESA Journal of Chemical Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The license terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) requires attribution to the original creator, permits non-commercial use, and does not allow for the application of legal or technological restrictions on others' use.
Abstract views: 42
,
PDF Downloads: 27
