EVALUASI KEGIATAN YANG BERDAMPAK PADA KUALITAS TEACHING FACTORY (TEFA) DI SMK NEGERI 3 SURABAYA

Authors

Rara Santika Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Theodorus Wibowo Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Keywords:

Teaching Factory, CIPP Evaluation, vocational education, Light Vehicle Engineering, TEFA quality

Abstract

This study evaluates the Teaching Factory (TEFA) program in the Light Vehicle Engineering program at SMK Negeri 3 Surabaya using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model. It adopts a descriptive qualitative approach, and data were gathered through interviews, observation, and document study. In the context aspect, the program is consistent with the school's vision and industry needs, but marketing to external customers remains weak. In the input aspect, productive teacher competence supports the program, while limited supervision, equipment damage, and supply-chain constraints pose challenges. In the process aspect, the industrial service workflow has been applied, yet practice scheduling, occupational safety, and 5R culture are not yet consistent. In the product aspect, TEFA improves students' technical competence and practical scores, but equitable work experience and final quality control need strengthening. Overall, TEFA equips students with skills, yet its sustainability depends on stronger management, facilities, block scheduling, and quality assurance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Arifin, D. C., Sakti, A., & Risal, A. A. N. (2026). Pengaruh implementasi Teaching Factory terhadap peningkatan kompetensi produktif siswa SMK SMTI Makassar. Jurnal Publikasi Sistem Informasi dan Manajemen Bisnis, 5(1), 731–739. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupsim.v5i1.6296

2. Artha, H. W., Ilham, Barokah, E. R., Jalinus, N., & Waskito. (2024). Implementasi pendidikan di SMK Negeri 3 Kota Solok: Tinjauan terhadap penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka, Teaching Factory dan Prakerin. JTPVI: Jurnal Teknologi dan Pendidikan Vokasi Indonesia, 2(2), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.24036/jtpvi.v2i2.160

3. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Berita resmi statistik No. 44/05/Th. XXVIII: Keadaan ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Februari 2025. Badan Pusat Statistik.

4. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.

5. Fattah, F. A., Martono, T., & Sawiji, H. (2021). Pembelajaran Teaching Factory untuk menghasilkan lulusan SMK yang sesuai dengan dunia usaha dan dunia industri. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ahlimedia, 1(1), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.47387/sena.v1i1.39

6. Fatwa, I. (2024). Implementation of Teaching Factory to Improve Student Competence and Innovation at State Vocational High School 4 Lhokseumawe. Indonesian Journal of Technical and Vocational Education Training, 1(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.62945/ijtvet.v1i2.170

7. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE.

8. Ngadiana, N., Rohaeti, I., Azka, M. A. A., Jamas, A. R., Huda, A. M., & Wardoyo, S. (2024). Teaching Factory terhadap Peningkatan Keterampilan Siswa di SMK Negeri 1 Cilegon. Edukasi Elita: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 2(1), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.62383/edukasi.v2i1.988

9. Nugroho, P., Utomo, M., Turijin, Sugiarto, T., Sugiarta, Rahayu, E. S., Syah, M., & Wicaksono, W. (2023). Panduan Teaching Factory Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Direktorat Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Vokasi, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

10. OECD. (2023). OECD Skills Outlook 2023: Skills for a resilient green and digital transition. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/27452f29-en

11. Palupi, N., Akhyar, M., & Sutrisno, V. L. P. (2023). Keefektifan pelaksanaan Teaching Factory pada Kompetensi Keahlian Teknik Pemesinan di SMK Warga Surakarta. NOZEL Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin, 5(3), 142. https://doi.org/10.20961/nozel.v5i3.76891

12. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.

13. Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2016). Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2016 tentang Revitalisasi Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan dalam rangka peningkatan kualitas dan daya saing sumber daya manusia Indonesia.

14. Santika, R. A. M. (2026). Evaluasi kegiatan yang berdampak pada kualitas Teaching Factory (TEFA) di SMK Negeri 3 Surabaya [Laporan tugas akhir, Universitas Negeri Surabaya].

15. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer Imprints, Wiley.

16. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (19th ed.). Alfabeta.

17. Suyitno. (2022). Investigation of Teaching Factory (TEFA) implementation in vocational education. VANOS Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.30870/vanos.v7i1.14202

18. Telaumbanua, D., Zega, Y., Zalukhu, S. J., Simatupang, W., & Ana, Y. (2024). Evaluasi penyerapan kompetensi siswa SMK Swasta Pembda Nias pada mata pelajaran produktif menggunakan metode penilaian otentik. Afeksi: Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 5(6), 1090–1094. https://doi.org/10.59698/afeksi.v5i6.407