Depicting Hierarchy and Solidarity Through Social Deixis in The Queen 2006 Movie:
A Study of Royal Linguistic Practices
Keywords:
social deixis, social hierarchy, social factorAbstract
This study aims to examines the use of social deixis and the underlying social factors in The Queen 2006 Movie. This research focuses on the use of honorific terms as a reflection of the social stratification of the British monarchy. The primary issue of this study lies in how social deixis is used to mark social relationships and the factors that influence language choice among characters. This study aims to demonstrate the type of social deixis, as well as reveal the factors that influence social deixis and the social and power relations reflected in the monarchy system. The research design of this study uses qualitative descriptive using Levinson's theory (1983) to find out the type of social deixis and Janet Holmes' theory (2013) to find out the social dynamics in the movie. The data of this research is a conversation containing social deixis in The Queen 2006 movie that forms a social dimension between characters. The results show two types of social deixis, namely relational and absolute social deixis. Relational deixis is found in the use of first names, pet name, and endearment term. Absolute social deixis is found in the use of honorific titles, such as, “Your Majesty”. Social status, formality, and conversational context are factors that influence the use of social deixis. The findings of this study confirm that social deixis is not only a communication tool but as a marker and reinforcement of social hierarchy in the monarchical system.
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D., & Wolitzky, A. (2023). Mistrust, Misperception, and Misunderstanding: Imperfect Information and Conflict Dynamics. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–53. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4574626
Chandra, O. H., & Salsabila, G. (2022). The Analysis of Social Deixis Used in the Downton Abbey and Made in Dagenham Movies Set in the Twentieth Century. Culturalistics: Journal of Cultural, Literary, and Linguistic Studies, 6(3), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.14710/culturalistics.v6i3.16077
Erving Goffman. (1959). Presentation of self in everyday life. American Journal of Sociology, 55, 17–25.
Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistic (L. U. Geoffrey Leech & Mick Short (ed.); 4th Editio). Routledge.
Jirani, A. N. A. (2023). Social Deixis in the King’s Man Movie. http://repository.unhas.ac.id:443/id/eprint/26353
Purba, F. R., Sidabutar, U., & Silitonga, H. (2024). An Analysis of Deixis Found in Student English Textbook When English Rings a Bell for the Eight Grade of Junior High School. Journal Of Education And Teaching Learning (JETL), 6(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.51178/jetl.v6i2.1842
Putra, Z. D., Sofyan, D., & Sembiring, B. (2020). Analysis of Social Deixis in the Madness of King George Movie. Jadila: Journal of Development and Innovation in Language and Literature Education, 1(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.52690/jadila.v1i1.15
Stephen C. Levinson. (1983). PRAGMATICS. In N. Vjn. F. N. B.COMRI E, R. HUDDLESTON, R. LASS, D. LIGHTFOOT, J. LYONS, P. H. MATTHEWS, R. POSNER, S. ROMAINE, N. V. SMITH (Ed.), Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 lRP 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011--4211, USA 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Language Horizon: Journal of Language Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 39
,
PDF Downloads: 49
1.png)