PRAGMATIC REPRESENTATION OF JAVANESE CULTURAL VALUES IN SURAKARTA MAYORAL CAMPAIGN BILLBOARDS
Keywords:
Keywords: applied linguistics; speech acts; politeness strategies; campaign discourse; political communicationAbstract
ABSTRACT. This study examines how Javanese cultural values are pragmatically represented in political campaign billboards during the 2025–2030 Surakarta mayoral election. The study focuses on the campaign discourse of two candidate pairs, Respati Ardi–Astrid Widayani and Teguh Prakosa–Bambang Gage, and examines how language is strategically employed to persuade voters while adhering to locally rooted norms of politeness and social harmony. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, 200 billboard texts were analyzed through the framework of speech act theory and politeness principles. The analysis identifies locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts and relates them to Javanese sociocultural concepts such as unggah-ungguh (speech etiquette), andhap asor (humility), rukun (social harmony), and tepa selira (empathic consideration). The findings indicate that directive and expressive speech acts dominate the discourse, functioning not only to mobilize political support but also to construct moral legitimacy and communal alignment. Positive politeness strategies are consistently employed to soften political authority, minimize social distance, and resonate with the cultural expectations of Surakarta’s predominantly Javanese electorate. By foregrounding local wisdom in political messaging, this study contributes to applied linguistics and pragmatics by demonstrating how culturally embedded pragmatic competence shapes persuasive communication in local democratic contexts. Pedagogically, the findings offer valuable insights for integrating local cultural norms into the teaching of pragmatic awareness in political and professional communication.
Keywords: Javanese cultural values; political billboard discourse; pragmatic competence; politeness strategies; speech acts
Downloads
References
REFERENCES
Aghaee, F., & KhosraviNik, M. (2022). Pragmatics of political discourse: Speech acts and stance-taking in Iranian presidential debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 196, 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.02.012
Bayram, F. (2021). Politeness and impoliteness in populist political discourse: A critical-pragmatic approach. Discourse & Society, 32(6), 689–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265211023058
Bousfield, D. (2023). Politeness, impoliteness and strategic facework in political interaction. Journal of Language and Politics, 22(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22001.bou
Cap, P. (2024). Discourse strategies and pragmatic framing in populist campaign messages. Journal of Language and Politics, 23(2), 250–271. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23005.cap
Dynel, M. (2022). (Im)politeness in political communication: A socio-pragmatic overview. Discourse, Context & Media, 48, 100623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100623
Fahlevi, H., & Randa, P. (2015). A comparative analysis of financial performance and Sharia conformity of Indonesian and Malaysian Islamic banks. In Proceedings of the 17th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference, Venice, Italy.
Harris, S., & Muntigl, P. (2023). Pragmatics of persuasion in campaign discourse: Speech acts and relational work. Language and Communication, 92, 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2023.05.004
Hasanuddin, L., Rahman, I., & Syahrul, A. (2015). Investigation of the head impact power of a sepak takraw ball on sepak takraw players. Movement, Health & Movement Journal, 4(2), 47–58.
Haugh, M., & Chang, W. S. (2022). (Im)politeness in mediated political discourse: Facework and alignment in online debates. Pragmatics, 32(5), 643–666. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22010.hau
Ilie, C. (2021). Parliamentary discourse and politeness strategies: Managing disagreement in political interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 177, 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.009
Irsyadillah. (2016, July 11). “Project Fear” campaign: Lessons from the EU referendum in the UK. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2016/07/11/project-fear-campaign-lessons-from-the-eu-referendum-in-the-uk.html
Khajavi, Y., & Abbasian, R. (2023). Discursive (im)politeness in political interviews: A cross-cultural perspective. Pragmatics and Society, 14(4), 569–590. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21040.kha
Malyuga, E. N., & Ponomarenko, E. V. (2024). Speech acts and pragmalinguistic features in contemporary political communication. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 28(2), 250–271. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2024-28-2-250-271
Muchlisin, Z. A., & Hasri, I. (2015). Karakteristik ikan dominan di Danau Laut Tawar, Takengon [Characteristics of the dominant fish in Lake Laut Tawar, Takengon]. Jakarta: AMAFRAD Press.
Mustafa, F. (2015). Using corpora to design a reliable test instrument for English proficiency assessment. In Proceedings of the TEFLIN International Conference: Teaching and Assessing L2 Learners in the 21st Century (pp. 344–354). Denpasar: Universitas Udayana.
Nugroho, A. (2016). Economic analysis on production changes, market integration and export challenges of coffee sector in Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation). Kyoto University, Kyoto. https://doi.org/10.14989/doctor.k19902
Pillai, S. (2015). Rhoticity in Malaysian English: The emergence of a new norm? In U. Gut, R. Fuchs, & E. M. Wunder (Eds.), Universal or diverse paths to English linguistics (pp. 23–40). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Semantics. (2010). Croatian language portal online. http://www.howtowriteanarticle.com
Smith, J. (2011). How to write a scientific paper: What you must know. Language for Specific Purposes in Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 51–59.
Smith, J., & Rea, K. (2016). The structure of an article. In D. O. Pete & S. M. Trevor (Eds.), Language for specific purposes (pp. 112–150). Town: Publisher.
Wardah. (2008). To what extent can the WTO agreements help to combat poverty in developing countries? (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University of Southampton, Southampton.
Yusuf, Y. Q., Pillai, S., & Mohd Ali, N. T. A. (2013). Speaking Acehnese in Malaysia. Language and Communication, 33(1), 50–60.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Language Horizon: Journal of Language Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 0
,
PDF Downloads: 0
1.png)