TINJAUAN YURIDIS TENTANG PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA SECARA RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PERKARA NOMOR : PDM-19/SUKAMARA/EOH.2/08/2022 KEJAKSAAN NEGERI SUKAMARA

JURIDICAL REVIEW REGARDING THE SETTLEMENT OF CRIMINAL CASES IN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE CASE NUMBER: PDM-19/SUKAMARA/EOH.2/08/2022 SUKAMARA STATE ATTORNEY

  • Dea Risma Salsabila UNESA
  • Pudji Astuti UNESA

Abstract

Restorative Justice is the restoration of bonds and redemption of mistakes committed by perpetrators of crimes against their victims, as well as providing opportunities for perpetrators of crimes to take direct responsibility. In terms of settlement of criminal cases that can be terminated by law, it has several classifications, namely minor crimes, cases of women who are in conflict with the law, children's cases and narcotics cases. One of the cases that can be resolved with Restorative Justice is embezzlement. Embezzlement is defined as taking possession of goods or something that is owned by another person but this action is not something against the law, but in use it is used unlawfully as if it were his own. In the case of Case Number: PDM-19/SUKAMARA/Eoh.2/08/2022, the termination of prosecution by the Prosecutor was not in accordance with Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. This research was conducted to examine and analyze whether cases that were terminated by law were in accordance with Article 5 Paragraph (1) letter c and Article 9 Paragraph (5) Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020.

The results obtained from research on Case Number: PDM-19/SUKAMARA/Eoh.2/08/2022, namely that it is in accordance with the concept of Restorative Justice however, is not in accordance with Article 5 Paragraph (1) letter c and Article 9 Paragraph (5) Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice in terms of the terms and process of the case.

Published
2023-02-15
Section
ART 1
Abstract Views: 91
PDF Downloads: 133