A Content Analysis of Reading Exercise in English Textbook “Work in Progress” Published by Ministry of Education Using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/rt.v14i03.72147Keywords:
Content Analysis, Reading Exercises, Textbook Evaluation, Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, Higher-Order Thinking SkillsAbstract
This study aims to analyze the cognitive levels of reading exercises presented in the English textbook “Work in Progress” published by the Ministry of Education using the framework of Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. This research employs a qualitative content analysis method to examine the distribution of cognitive processes reflected in the reading tasks. The data were collected from selected reading exercises in the textbook and categorized into six cognitive levels: remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating. The findings indicate that the majority of reading exercises are dominated by lower-order thinking skills (LOTS), particularly at the levels of remembering and understanding. In contrast, higher-order thinking skills (HOTS), such as analyzing, evaluating, and creating, are less frequently represented. This imbalance suggests that the textbook has not fully supported the development of students’ critical thinking and analytical skills. Furthermore, this study emphasizes the importance of a more balanced distribution of cognitive levels in reading exercises to enhance students’ comprehension and higher-level thinking abilities. The results are expected to provide valuable insights for textbook developers, teachers, and curriculum designers in improving the quality of instructional materials. In conclusion, integrating a broader range of cognitive processes in reading exercises is essential to foster students’ active engagement and critical literacy development.
Downloads
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn & Bacon.
Ayu, M., & Inderawati, R. (2018). EFL textbook evaluation: The analysis of tasks presented in English textbook. Teknosastik, 16(1), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.33365/ts.v16i1.87
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Heinemann.
Febraningrum, M. I. N., & Suroso, B. (2023). A content analysis of English textbook "English for Nusantara" for 7th grade junior high school in Kurikulum Merdeka. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 13, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v13i.897
Hidayah, I. (2021). A content analysis of English textbook "When English Rings a Bell" for second grade of junior high school [Undergraduate thesis, UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta].
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage.
Mithans, M., & Ivanuš Grmek, M. (2020). The use of textbooks in the teaching-learning process. In New horizons in subject-specific education: Research aspects of subject-specific didactics (pp. 201–228). University of Maribor Press. https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-358-6.10
Nuryanto, A., Tatihoran, an, Firdaus, R., & Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten, U. (2025). Research Instrument: Instrument Development and Instrument Calibration (Vol. 9, Issue 1). https://journal.uaindonesia.ac.id/index.php/ijecie
Theresia, C., Gultom, J. J., & Siregar, T. M. S. (2021). Bloom's taxonomy on reading exercises in English textbook "Bahasa Inggris" for grade ten senior high school students. Register: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.24114/reg.v8i4.24677
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Celsilia Lusita Hermawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 0
,
PDF Downloads: 0