Identification and Prediction of Fresh Gasoline Locations and Branding Using Newly Targeted Compound Chromatograms with Chemometrics and Machine Learning

Aidil Fahmi Shadan; Hafizan Juahir

doi:10.26740/ujc.v12n2.p73-82

Aidil Fahmi Shadan Jabatan Kimia Malaysia, 46661 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Hafizan Juahir East Coast Environmental Research Institute (ESERI), Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Gong Badak, 21300 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia ; Faculty of Bioresources and Food Industry, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Besut Campus, 22200 Besut, Terengganu, Malaysia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/ujc.v12n2.p73-82

Keywords: forensic science, arson, chemometrics techniques, Malaysia

Abstract

The detection and use of gasoline at scenes of crimes such as arson is of high interest in forensic investigations. In this work, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to analyse the gasoline samples and chemometrics namely principal component analysis (PCA), discriminant analysis (DA), and classification and regression tree (CART) machine learning were applied to identify and discriminate the gasoline brands and locations of origin. This study includes three popular gasoline brands collected from stations in eight different Malaysian states, including one oil refinery. The PCA result of 73.6% variation of the first and second principal components for the new targeted compounds chromatogram (TCC) and DA using the discriminant-analysis method correctly classified 94.3% of training samples for location-of-origin and 71.7% of training samples for brand. A novel two-C&R-trees (CART) machine-learning model is also developed and effectively applied to 100 unidentified gasoline samples, with a mean absolute error of 1.1% (location) and 0.4% (brand). The obtained results demonstrate this methodology’s potential to help resolve criminal investigations.

References

1. Sinkov NA, Sandercock PML, Harynuk JJ. 2014, Chemometric classification of casework arson samples based on gasoline content. Forensic Sci Int.; 235:24-31.
2. Pert AD, Baron MG, Birkett JW. 2006, Review of analytical techniques for arson residues. J Forensic Sci.;51(5):1033–49.
3. Hupp AM, Marshall LJ, Campbell DI, et al. 2008, Chemometric analysis of diesel fuel for forensic and environmental applications. Anal Chim Acta;606(2):159–71.
4. Stauffer, Eric, Lentini, et al. 2003, ASTM standards for fire debris analysis: A review. Forensic science international.;132. 63-7.
5. Flumignan DL, Boralle N, de Oliveira JE. 2010, Screening Brazilian commercial gasoline quality by hydrogen nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic fingerprintings and pattern-recognition multivariate chemometric analysis. Talanta.;82(1):99–105.
6. González M, Ayuso J, Álvarez JA, et al. 2015, Application of an HS-MS for the detection of ignitable liquids from fire debris. Talanta.;142:150–6.
7. Peschier LJC, Grutters MMP, Hendrikse JN. 2018, Using alkylate components for classifying gasoline in fire debris samples. J Forensic Sci.;63(2):420–30.
8. Boczkaj G, Jaszczołt M, Przyjazny A, et al. 2013, Application of normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography followed by gas chromatography for analytics of diesel fuel additives. Anal Bioanal Chem.;405(18):6095–103.
9. Balabin RM &Safieva RZ. 2008, Gasoline classification by source and type based on near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy data. Fuel;87(7):1096–101.
10. Balabin RM, Safieva RZ, Lomakina EI. 2010, Gasoline classification using near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy data: com- parison of multivariate techniques. Anal Chim Acta;671(1-2):27–35.
11. Jais, Daud, Sharifah et al. 2020, Forensic Analysis of Accelerant on Different Fabrics Using Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and Chemometrics Techniques. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences.
12. Pereira RCC, Skrobot VL, Castro EVR, et al. 2006, Determination of gasoline adulteration by principal components analysis-linear discriminant analysis applied to FTIR spectra. Energy Fuels;20(3):1097–102.
13. Teixeira LSG, Oliveira FS, Dossantos HC, et al. 2008, Multivariate calibration in Fourier transform infrared spectrometry as a tool to detect adulterations in Brazilian gasoline. Fuel;87(3):346–352.
14. Malmquist LMV, Olsen RR, Hansen AB, et al. 2007, Assessment of oil weathering by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, time warping and principal component analysis. J Chromatogr A.;1164(1-2):262–270.
15. González, M. J., Ferreiro-González, M., Barbero, et al. 2019, Novel method based on ion mobility spectrometry sum spectrum for the characterization of ignitable liquids in fire debris. Talanta. 199, 189–194.
16. Lee XQ, Sandercock PML, Harynuk JJ. 2016, The influence of temperature on the pyrolysis of household materials. J Anal Appl Pyrol.;118:75–85.
17. Figueiredo, Christophe B.Y. Cordella, Delphine Jouan-Rimbaud Bouveresse, et al. 2018, Evaluation of an untargeted chemometric approach for the source inference of ignitable liquids in forensic science, Forensic Science International.
18. Kumar R, Sharma V. 2018, Chemometrics in Forensic Science, Trends in Analytical Chemistry.;105:191-201.
19. Ghazi MGM, Lee LC, Samsudin AS et al. 2022, Evaluation of ensemble data preprocessing strategy on forensic gasoline classification using untargeted GC–MS data and classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm, Microchemical Journal;182.
20. ASTM E1618-19. 2019, Standard test method for ignitable liquid residues in extracts from fire debris samples by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org. http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?E1618-19
21. Steinberg D. Chapter 10 CART: Classification and regression trees. 2009. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Chapter-10-CART-%3A-Classification-and-Regression-Steinberg/53dd76e162f69c48652a1146b32dd5c06792a801
22. Gonzalez S, Kroyan Y, Sarjovaara T et al. 2021, Prediction of Gasoline Blend Ignition Characteristics Using Machine Learning Models, Energy and Fuels;35: 9332–9340.