Analisis butir soal mata pelajaran ekonomi: Validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, dan daya pembeda

Dian Rachmawati; Andika Bayu Pradana

doi:10.26740/jupe.v13n3.p273-284

Authors

Dian Rachmawati Universitas Negeri Malang
Andika Bayu Pradana Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jupe.v13n3.p273-284

Keywords:

validity, reliability, discriminatory power, level of difficulty, test items

Abstract

This study aims to improve the quality of assessment in economics subjects, particularly the topic of scarcity in grade X of high school. This study uses validity, reliability, difficulty level and discriminating power tests to analyze 25 previously developed questions. The test questions were conducted on 30 students of grade X of high school. From the results of the validity and reliability tests using SPSS 26, as many as 22 of the 25 questions (20 multiple choice and 5 essay) were declared valid and reliable. While the difficulty level test of the 25 questions is classified as easy, but from the calculation of the discriminating power of the questions, they have good quality to be used for assessment. From the test results, this study can be a reference for assessment tools in economics subjects, especially on the topic of scarcity in grade X of high school in Indonesia. However, further research is needed to improve the quality of the difficulty level of these questions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anshari, M. I., Nasution, R., Irsyad, M., Alifa, A. Z., & Zuhriyah, I. A. (2024). Analisis Validitas dan Reliabilitas Butir Soal Sumatif Akhir Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran PAI. EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 6(1), 964–975. https://doi.org/10.31004/EDUKATIF.V6I1.5931

Apriliana Saputri, H., Joti Larasati, N., Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, P., & Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, F. (2023). ANALISIS INSTRUMEN ASSESMEN : VALIDITAS, RELIABILITAS, TINGKAT KESUKARAN DAN DAYA BEDA BUTIR SOAL. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 9(5), 2986–2995. https://doi.org/10.36989/DIDAKTIK.V9I5.2268

Arbeni, W., Windiani, A., Sariyani Br Sihotang, D., Anggraini, N., Wulandari, S., Nugroho, A., & Syekh Abdul Halim Hasan Binjai, I. (2025). Test Reliability Analysis in Educational Evaluation: A Quantitative Approach to Consistency and Validity. Holistic Science, 5(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.56495/HS.V5I1.838

Arifin, Z. (2017). Kriteria Instrumen dalam suatu Penelitian. 2(1), 28.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11092-008-9068-5/METRICS

Brookhart, S. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. https://www.sciepub.com/reference/361905

Brookhart, S. M., & Nitko, A. J. (2019). Educational Assessment of Students.

Crocker, L. M., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory (M.B.M. Staudt & M. Stranz, Ed.). 8–11.

Damayanti, W. W., Halidjah, S., Program, R. P., Pendidikan, S., Sekolah, G., Fkip, D., & Pontianak, U. (2021). ANALISIS TINGKAT KESUKARAN BUTIR SOAL PILIHAN GANDAPADA PENILAIAN TENGAH SEMESTER KELAS IV.

Earle, S., & Earle, S. (2020). Balancing the demands of validity and reliability in practice: Case study of a changing system of primary science summative assessment. London Review of Education, 18(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.18.2.06

Elliott, C., & Balasubramanyam, V. (2016). Assessing students: Real-world analyses underpinned by economic theory. Cogent Economics and Finance, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2016.1151171

Gay, L., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH.

Govindasamy, P., Cumming, T. M., & Abdullah, N. (2024). Validity and reliability of a needs analysis questionnaire for the development of a creativity module. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 24(3), 637–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12659

Haladyna, T. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2013). Developing and validating test items. Developing and Validating Test Items, 1–446. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850381

Hanifah, N., Studi, P., & Konseling, B. (2014a). PERBANDINGAN TINGKAT KESUKARAN, DAYA PEMBEDA BUTIR SOAL DAN RELIABILITAS TES BENTUK PILIHAN GANDA BIASA DAN PILIHAN GANDA ASOSIASI MATA PELAJARAN EKONOMI. SOSIO E-KONS, 6(1), 41–55.

Hanifah, N., Studi, P., & Konseling, B. (2014b). Perbandingan Tingkat Kesukaran, Daya Pembeda Butir Soal Dan Reliabilitas Tes Bentuk Pilihan Ganda Biasa Dan Pilihan Ganda Asosiasi Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi. SOSIO E-KONS, 6(1), 41–55.

Lahuri, S. Bin, & Dwi Rahayu, H. M. (2024). Concept of Scarcity in Conventional Economics; A Critical Analysis With Islamic Economic Perspective-Konsep Scarcity Dalam Ekonomi Konvensional; Sebuah Analisis Kritis Dengan Perspektif Ekonomi Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 10(1), 472. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v10i1.11950

Martha, J. (2017). ISU KELANGKAAN AIR DAN ANCAMANNYA TERHADAP KEAMANAN GLOBAL. In Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Komunikasi: Vol. VII (Issue 2). http://water.usgs.gov/edu/earthwherewater.html

Mustamin, R. (2024). The role of formative and summative assessment in improving learning quality and student learning outcomes. Journal of Strategy and Transformation in Educational Management, 1(1), 17–21. https://jostem.professorline.com/index.php/journal/article/view/4

Novikasari, I. (2017). Uji Validitas Instrumen. Seminar Nasional Riset Inovatif 2017, 1(1), 530–535.

Oktavianto Putra, S., Qudsiyah, K., Purnomo Susanto, H., Matematika, P., & PGRI Pacitan, S. (2020). PRESENTASE KESEIMBANGAN TINGKAT KESULITAN SOAL-SOAL UJI KOMPETENSI MATERI FUNGSI PADA BUKU TEKS MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS X SMA BERDASARKAN TAKSONOMI BLOOM. http://repository.stkippacitan.ac.id

Ridhwan, M. (2017). Understanding Formative and Summative Assessment for EFL Teachers: Theoretical Reflections on Assessment for Learning. J-SHMIC : Journal of English for Academic, 4(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.25299/JSHMIC.2017.VOL4(1).505

Siregar, T. M., Agustina, N., Siahaan, F. B., Sinaga, L. L., Prabawa, I., & Sagala, R. Z. (2024). Analisis Validitas dan Reliabilitas Butir Soal Pilihan Ganda Dalam Mata Pelajaran Matematika Kelas 12 Semester Genap di SMAN 1 Adiankoting. 1(2).

Sudaryono, Rahardja, U., Aini, Q., Isma Graha, Y., & Lutfiani, N. (2019). Validity of Test Instruments. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1364(1), 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1364/1/012050

Sudijono. (2011). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. https://www.rajagrafindo.co.id/produk/pengantar-evaluasi-pendidikan/

Suprapto, E., Saryanto, S., Sumiharsono, R., & Ramadhan, S. (2020). The analysis of ınstrument quality to measure the students’ higher order thinking skill in physics learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4), 520–527. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.42

Thompson, W. J., Clark, A. K., & Jake, W. (2024). Improving Instructional Decision-Making Using Diagnostic Classification Models. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12619

Trianingsih, L. (2023). Analisis Kualitas Tes dan Butir Soal Integral pada Evaluasi Formatif Matematika Teknik. 9(2), 44–57.

Triola, M. M., & Holloway, W. J. (2011). Enhanced virtual microscopy for collaborative education. BMC Medical Education, 11(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-4/TABLES/2

Welsandt, N. C. J., Fortunati, F., Winther, E., & Abs, H. J. (2024). Constructing and validating authentic assessments: the case of a new technology-based assessment of economic literacy. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40461-024-00158-0/TABLES/5

Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STUEDUC.2011.03.001