Feasibility of a Guided Inquiry-Based Biotechnology E-Module in Enhancing Scientific Literacy

yuniar rakhmawati nur Aisah; yuliani yuliani

doi:10.26740/bioedu.v15n1.p144-152

Feasibility of a Guided Inquiry-Based Biotechnology E-Module in Enhancing Scientific Literacy

Authors

yuniar rakhmawati nur Aisah Universitas Negeri Surabaya
yuliani yuliani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/bioedu.v15n1.p144-152

Keywords:

E-Module, Biotechnology material, Scientific literacy, Guided Inquiry, feasibility

Abstract

Scientific literacy is essential in the 21st century, but Indonesian students' skills remain low, as shown by the 2022 PISA results. This study aims to develop a guided inquiry-based biotechnology E-Module to train students' scientific literacy skills. The research employed the ADDIE model and was conducted in the Biology Department of UNESA, with the module tested on 33 tenth-grade students at SMA Negeri 1 Puri. Validity was obtained through expert judgment, practicality was evaluated through observations of learning activity implementation and student responses, and effectiveness was assessed through improvements in pretest and posttest scores on scientific literacy skills. Data were analyzed using a quantitative approach. The validation results showed a 90% feasibility percentage, categorized as very valid. The E-Module demonstrated high practicality, with implementation scores of 98.05% and student response scores of 93.80%. Effectiveness was observed based on the N-Gain value for science literacy skills, with an average of 0.75, showing high improvement (≥ 0.7) in five of six scientific literacy indicators: identifying phenomena, formulating questions, designing experiments, collecting data, and drawing conclusions. One indicator, interpreting data and representing it in different forms, achieved an N-Gain score of 0.39 (moderate category). These results indicate that the E-Module effectively facilitates the development of scientific literacy skills. Therefore, the guided inquiry-based biotechnology E-Module is considered valid, practical, and effective in training students' scientific literacy skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, A. (2022). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. CV. Literasi Nusantara Abadi

Aditya Pramana, I. G. N., Suarni, N. K., & Margunayasa, I. G. (2022). Relevansi Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme dengan Model Inkuiri Terbimbing terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Ide Guru, 9(2), 492-504. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v9i2.875

Anam, F. (2017). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Unusida Press.

Aulia , J., Ramdani, A., & Artayasa, I. P. . (2022). Pengembangan Elektronik Modul pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan Berbasis Inkuiri. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 4(3), 87–91.

Azizah, D. N., Irwandi, D., & Saridewi, N. (2021). Pengaruh model pembelajaran problem based learning berkonteks socio scientific issues terhadap kemampuan literasi sains siswa pada materi asam basa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia (JRPK), 11(1), 1218.

Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Ascd.

Efendi, R. N., & Nugraha, U. (2024). Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Modul Elektronik Matematika Berbasis Discovery Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Tematik Dikdas, 9(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.22437/jptd.v9i1.26413

Fa’idah, R. N., & Mahanal, S. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing terhadap Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas V SD. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(12), 1704-1709.

Harlen, W. (2010). Principles and Big Ideas of Science Education (5th ed.). Association for Science Education.

Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and Learning Science as Argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20395

Nurfahzuni, D., & Budiyanto, M. (2023). Implementasi Guided Inquiry Learning Berbantuan Simulasi Interaktif Phet Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains. Pensa: E-Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 11(1), 53–60.

OECD (2023), PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en.

OECD, oecd. (2024). PISA 2025 SCIENCE FRAMEWORK (DRAFT). accessed : https://pisa-framework.oecd.org/science-2025/

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Puspitasari, A. D. (2019). Penerapan media pembelajaran fisika menggunakan modul cetak dan modul elektronik pada siswa SMA. JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 7(1), 17-25.

Putri, I. B. K., & Wulandari, F. (2022). Scientific Literacy Skill Through Digital Media Professional Pdf Flip Based Book in Elementary School. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2266–2271. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.2181

Sadler, P. M., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2007). Introducing students to the elements of argumentation: What is scientific argumentation? Science Education, 91(4), 605–630.

Sari, N., Husein, H., & Anwar, M. (2022). Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Kelas Xi Mipa Sma Negeri 8 Bone Pada Model Dl Materi Koloid. SCIENCE : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 2(3), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v2i3.1513

Shellawati, S., Sunarti, T., & Fisika, J. (2018). Penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi sains peserta didik SMA. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 7(3), 407-412.

Sirate, S. F., & Ramadhana, R. (2017). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Berbasis Keterampilan Literasi. Inspiratif Pendidikan, 6(2), 316-335.

Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sujudi, M. S., Idris, T., Suryanti., & Handayani, P. H. (2020). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Berdasarkan PISA Siswa SMPIslam As-Shofa Kota Pekanbaru . Journal of Natural Science and Integration. 3(1),58-69