Concept or Practice: Kajian Tentang Respon Kemampuan Kognitif Mahasiswa Pada Matakuliah Penganggaran
Abstract
The way a person receives knowledge has various kinds of responses according to their abilities. This research aims to develop an effective learning approach and the response of students' cognitive abilities in budgeting courses both in theory and practice. A quantitative approach is used as a type of Research and Development (R&D) methods on 102 accounting students who taking Budgeting Courses. Data were obtained from Accounting Students of the Faculty of Economics, UM, who were still taking budgeting courses and were given a questionnaire. The results of observations made in the budgeting course showed that the enthusiasm shown by students showed a good and enthusiastic attitude when explained by the lecturer about practical and theoretical. However, when the students were asked to do practice questions in the theory course, they had difficulty applying the theory to the problem. When online lectures, the conclusion is the use of appropriate learning methods and approaches and media will be simulate the response of students' cognitive abilities both theoretically and practically.
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
American Educational Research Association 2001 Annual Meeting April 10–14, 2001, Seattle, WA. (2000). Educational Researcher, 29(8), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029008032
Aristianti, Listiana; Listiadi, A. (2019). Pengaruh Pemahaman Perpajakan, Intensitas Pemberian Tugas Dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Akuntansi Perpajakan Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi (JPAK), 7(3), 294–300.
Baharudin dan Esa Nur wahyuni. (2010). TEORI BELAJAR & PEMBELAJARAN. Ar-Ruzz Media.
Belajar, H., Pelajaran, M., Syariah, A., Aifiando, I. P., & Hakim, L. (2021). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar , Minat , Dan Motivasi Sebagai Variabel Moderating Terhadap. 9(1), 123–130.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
Entwistle, N. (1995). Frameworks for understanding as experienced in essay writing and in preparing for examination. Educational Psychologist, 30(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3001_5
Gagne, R. M. (1997). Kondisi Belajar dan Teori Pembelajaran. Terjemahan Munandir. Depdikbud Dirjen Pendidikan Tinggi.
Graesser, A., Olde, B., & Lu, S. (2000). Question-Driven Explanatory Reasoning About Devices That Malfunction. Psychology, 114–119.
Hallion, L. S., Steinman, S. A., & Kusmierski, S. N. (2018). Difficulty concentrating in generalized anxiety disorder: An evaluation of incremental utility and relationship to worry. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 53, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.10.007
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Kurniasih, R. (2010). KEMAMPUAN KOGNITIF MAHASISWA DITINJAU DARI MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN DAN INTENSITAS BELAJAR MAHASISWA DALAM MATA KULIAH AKUNTANSI KEUANGAN MENENGAH PROGDI PENDIDIKAN EKONOMI AKUNTANSI FKIP UMS TAHUN AJARAN 2009/2010.
L. Dee Fink. (2013). Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses, Revised and Updated. John Wiley and Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Creating+Significant+Learning+Experiences%3A+An+Integrated+Approach+to+Designing+College+Courses%2C+Revised+and+Updated-p-9781118416327
Lehtomäki, E., Moate, J., & Posti-Ahokas, H. (2016). Global connectedness in higher education: student voices on the value of cross-cultural learning dialogue. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 2011–2027. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007943
Mandur, K., Nendi, F., Men, F. E., & Jelatu, S. (2021). KONEKSI MATEMATIS MELALUI TAKSONOMI FINK untuk membantu mahasiswa mempelajari pengetahuan , keterampilan , dan sikap yang dasar ), application ( aplikasi ), integration ( integrasi ), human dimension ( dimensi sosial ), menyelesaikan soal-soal koneksi mat. 7, 41–51.
Mayer, R. E. (1989). Models for Understanding. Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059001043
Newmann, F. M., Bryk, A. S., & Nagaoka, J. K. (2001). Authentic Intellectual Work and Standardized Tests: Conflict or Coexistence. In East (Issue January).
Noordman, L. G. M., & Vonk, W. (n.d.). Memory-based processing in understanding causal information. 1998(Discourse Processes), 26(2-3), 191–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545044
Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful Learning: The Essential Factor for Conceptual Change in Limited or Inappropriate Propositional Hierarchies Leading to Empowerment of Learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10032
O’Dwyer, L. M., Wang, Y., & Shields, K. A. (2015). Teaching for conceptual understanding: A cross-national comparison of the relationship between teachers’ instructional practices and student achievement in mathematics. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-014-0011-6
Paul J. Feltovich, Richard L. Cooulson, Rand J. Spiro, J. F. A. (1994). Conceptual Understanding and Stability, and Knowledge Shields fro Fending Off Conceptual Change.
Pratiwi, W. W. W. (2015). EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS PROYEK DENGAN FLASH GAME TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR AKUNTANSI PADA MATERI PEMROSESAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN KELAS X SMK PALEBON SEMARANG TAHUN AJARAN 2014/2015. Https://Lib.Unnes.Ac.Id/21206/1/7101411201-s.Pdf.
Sagala, S. (2010). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Alfabeta.
Schacter, J., & Thum, Y. M. (2004). Paying for high- and low-quality teaching. Economics of Education Review, 23(4), 411–430. https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:23:y:2004:i:4:p:411-430
Slavin, R. E. (2009). Cooperative Learning Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Nusamedia.
Surya Dharma, MPA., P. . (2008). Pendekatan, jenis, dan metode penelitian pendidikan.
Wagner, T. (2012). Creating innovators: The making of young people who will change the world. Simon and Schuster.
Wenglinsky, H. (2002). How schools matter: The link between teacher classroom practices and students academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(12), 1–30.
Wyman, B. G., & Randel, J. M. (1998). The Relation of Knowledge Organization to Performance of a Complex Cognitive Task. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199806)12:3<251::AID-ACP510>3.0.CO;2-F
Copyright (c) 2021 Miranti Puspaningtyas, Sulastri Sulastri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi (JPAK) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract Views: 362
PDF Downloads: 165
