- Focus and Scope
- Publication Ethics
- Editorial Team
- Reviewer Team
- Author Guidelines
- Plagiarism Policy
- Copyright and License
- Open Access Policy
- Peer Review Process
- Author Fees
- Journal Contact
- Indexing and Abstracting
- Retraction and Withdrawal
- History
- Ownership and Management
- Journal Status
- Script Timeline
- Authorship
- Conflict of Interest
- Use of AI Gen
- Data Availability
- Research Ethics
- Research Misconduct
- Independence Statement
- Open Access
- Archiving and Repository
- Post-Publication Discussion
Peer Review Process
In the review process, this journal involves writers, editors, section editors, and reviewers. Where in the review process, JPAK applies the Double-Blind Review model to maintain confidentiality. Every submitted manuscript is checked first by the editor. If the article meets the focus and scope and this journal writing guidelines, then the document is continued to the reviewer to review the content and novelty of the manuscript. Otherwise, the manuscript will be returned to the author. A minimum of 2 reviewers will review each document for approximately 1-2 weeks with the criteria for assessing the manuscript as stated in the Article Assessment Form for Reviewers. Articles that have been submitted take an average of about 8 weeks to publish.
