ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS VIII PADA MATERI ZAT ADIKTIF DAN ADITIF
Abstract
The study aimed to analyze the critical thinking abilities of eighth grade students on substance addictions and addictive substances. The analysis of critical thinking capabilities in this study was modified using Ennis indicators such as simple explanations, basic skills, conclusions, further explanations, as well as strategies and tactics. This type of research is descriptive-quantitative. The research subjects used were all the students in the eighth grade of high school. The instrument used in this study is a critical thinking description test. Data collection techniques using test techniques. The data analysis technique used is a calculation of averages that are described based on the results of the calculation. The results of this study showed that the highest percentage score of critical thinking ability was in class D at 17% with an average of 16.26, while the lowest percentual score of critical thinking was in class A at 13% with an average of 11.91.
References
Alawiyah, N., & Marlina, R. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa. Journal homepage unsika.
Apriyani, L., Nurlaelah, I., & Setiawati, I. (2017). Penerapan Model PBL Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Akademik Siswa pada Materi Biologi. Quagga, 9(1), 41–54.
Dewi, F. (2015). Proyek Buku Digital: Upaya Peningkatan Keterampilan Abad 21 Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar Melalui Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek. Jurnal Metodik Didaktik, 9(2), 1-15.
Dharmawati, Rahayu, S., & Mahanal, S. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Berpikir. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(8), 1598–1606.
Ennis, R. H. (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispotion and Abilities. Chicago: University of Illinois.
Facione. (2013). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Millbrae, CA.: Measured Reasons and The California Academic Press.
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purpose of Educational Assessment and Instruction. California: The California Academic Press.
Jacob, S. M., & Sam, H. K. (2008). Measuring Critical Thinking in Problem Solving Through Online Discussion Forum in First Year University Mathematics. Hong Kong: Proceedings of International Multi Converence of Engineers and Computer Scientits 2008 - IAENG International Conference on Internet Computing and Web Services (ICICWS 2008).
Kemendikbud. (2015). Undang-Undang Nomor 53 Thaun 2015 Tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Jenjang Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta: Permendikbud.
Kemendikbud. (2016). Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Nafiah, Y. N., & Suyanto, W. (2017). Penerapan Model Pbm Untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sma. Diklabio: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Biologi, 1(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.33369/diklabio.1.1.45-53
Nugroho, R. (2018). HOT (Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi: Konsep, Pembelajaran, Penelitian, dan Soal-Soal). PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Nuryanti, L., Zubaidah, S., & Diantoro, M. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika Dan Pembelajarannya, 2006, 155–158.
Permendiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Tujuan Pendidikan. Permendiknas.
Riduwan. (2013). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wewe, Melkior. (2017). Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematika dengan Problem Posing pada Siswa Kelas VII SMP 4 Gowela Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara, 3(1). ISSN: 2459-97345.
Copyright (c) 2024 PENSA: E-JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SAINS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract Views: 0
PDF Downloads: 0
