Hubungan Mastery-Approach Achievement Goal Orientation dan Academic Dishonesty pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Sistem Non-Blok
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/cjpp.v13n03.p919-926Keywords:
mastery-approach achievement goal orientation, academic dishonesty, cheating, plagiarism, sistem pembelajaran non-blokAbstract
Latar Belakang: Academic dishonesty merupakan perilaku tidak jujur dalam konteks akademik yang dapat mengganggu integritas pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi. Mastery-approach achievement goal orientation menekankan penguasaan tugas dan peningkatan kompetensi diri sehingga diperkirakan berkaitan dengan rendahnya academic dishonesty. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui hubungan mastery-approach achievement goal orientation dengan cheating, outside help, plagiarism, dan electronic cheating pada mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Andalas dengan sistem pembelajaran non-blok. Metode: Penelitian kuantitatif ini menggunakan desain korelasional terhadap 347 mahasiswa S1 Psikologi dan Ilmu Biomedis yang dipilih melalui proportionate stratified random sampling. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan Academic Dishonesty Instrument dan Achievement Goal Questionnaire dimensi mastery-approach. Hasil: Mastery-approach tidak berhubungan signifikan dengan cheating (r = -.048; p = .372), outside help (rₛ = -.006; p = .918), plagiarism (rₛ = -.003; p = .960), maupun electronic cheating (rₛ = -.009; p = .867). Simpulan: Seluruh hipotesis alternatif ditolak; academic dishonesty perlu dipahami dengan mempertimbangkan faktor sosial dan kontekstual selain orientasi belajar individual dalam lingkungan akademik perguruan tinggi.
Abstract
Background: Academic dishonesty is dishonest behavior that may undermine learning integrity in higher education. Mastery-approach achievement goal orientation emphasizes task mastery and self-competence development and is assumed to relate to lower academic dishonesty. Objective: This study examined its relationship with cheating, outside help, plagiarism, and electronic cheating among Faculty of Medicine students at Universitas Andalas in a non-block learning system. Method: This quantitative correlational study involved 347 undergraduate Psychology and Biomedical Science students selected through proportionate stratified random sampling. Data were collected using the Academic Dishonesty Instrument and the mastery-approach dimension of the Achievement Goal Questionnaire. Results: Mastery-approach was not significantly related to cheating (r = -.048; p = .372), outside help (rₛ = -.006; p = .918), plagiarism (rₛ = -.003; p = .960), or electronic cheating (rₛ = -.009; p = .867). Conclusion: All alternative hypotheses were rejected; academic dishonesty should be understood by considering social and contextual factors beyond individual achievement goal orientation within contemporary higher education settings.
Downloads
References
Alsulami, S., Al Omar, Z., Binnwejim, M., Alhamdan, F., Aldrees, A., Al-bawardi, A., Alsohim, M., & Alhabeeb, M. (2018). Perception of academic stress among Health Science Preparatory Program students in two Saudi universities. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 9, 159–164.
https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S143151
Amalia, V., & Sembiring, L. S. (2024). Hubungan tingkat penalaran moral dengan kecurangan akademik pada mahasiswa Universitas Andalas. Jurnal Ilmu Perilaku, 8(2), 112–130.
Ampuni, S., Kautsari, N., Maharani, M., Kuswardani, S., & Buwono, S. B. S. (2019). Academic dishonesty in Indonesian college students: An investigation from a moral psychology perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(4), 395–417.
Azwar, S. (2017). Metode penelitian psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar.
Cuadrado, D., Salgado, J. F., & Moscoso, S. (2019). Prevalence and correlates of academic dishonesty: Towards a sustainable university. Sustainability, 11(21), 6062.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216062
Datu, J. A. D., Valdez, J. P. M., & Yang, W. (2022). The academically engaged life of mastery-oriented students: Causal ordering among positive emotions, mastery-approach goals, and academic engagement. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.), 27(1), 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2021.02.001
Daumiller, M., & Janke, S. (2019). The impact of performance goals on cheating depends on how performance is evaluated. AERA Open, 5(4), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419894276
Ednadita, G., Octavia, S., Khairunnisa, F. S., Rodhiyah, I., & Hendraputra, D. (2020). Effects of self-control on cheating among Indonesian college students. Indonesian Psychological Research, 2(2), 87–95.
https://doi.org/10.29080/ipr.v2i2.246
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
Fritz, T., Cruz, H. G., Janke, S., & Daumiller, M. (2023). Elucidating the associations between achievement goals and academic dishonesty: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 33.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09753-1
Guo, J., Hu, X., Elliot, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Murayama, K., Basarkod, G., Parker, P. D., & Dicke, T. (2023). Mastery-approach goals: A large-scale cross cultural analysis of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(2), 397–420.
https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000436
Guruswami, G. K., Mumtaz, S., Gopakumar, A., Khan, E., Abdullah, F., & Parahoo, S. K. (2023). Academic integrity perceptions among health-professions’ students: A cross-sectional study in the Middle East. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(2), 231–249.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09452-6
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
Holden, O. L., Norris, M. E., & Kuhlmeier, V. A. (2021). Academic integrity in online assessment: A research review. Frontiers in Education, 6, 639814.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.639814
International Center for Academic Integrity. (2020). Facts & statistics. International Center for Academic Integrity.
https://www.academicintegrity.org/aws/ICAI/pt/sp/facts
Intishar, I. N., Ampuni, S., & Buwono, S. B. S. (2024). Academic dishonesty in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of gender, moral self-concept, and academic self-efficacy. Jurnal Psikologi, 51(2), 121–138.
https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.90823
Iyer, R., & Eastman, J. K. (2008). The impact of unethical reasoning on academic dishonesty: Exploring the moderating effect of social desirability. Marketing Education Review, 18(2), 21–33.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2008.11489034
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.
https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Krou, M. R., Fong, C. J., & Hoff, M. A. (2021). Achievement motivation and academic dishonesty: A meta-analytic investigation. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 427–458.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09557-7
Kumar, R. (2019). Research methodology (5th ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Mulisa, F., & Ebessa, A. D. (2021). The carryover effects of college dishonesty on the professional workplace dishonest behaviors: A systematic review. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1935408.
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1935408
Oktavianus, E., & Dewi, D. K. (2025). Profil academic dishonesty di kalangan mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi. Liberosis: Jurnal Psikologi dan Bimbingan Konseling, 16(2), 61–70.
Orok, E., Adeniyi, F., Williams, T., Dosunmu, O., Ikpe, F., Orakwe, C., & Kukoyi, O. (2023). Causes and mitigation of academic dishonesty among healthcare students in a Nigerian university. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19, 13.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00135-2
Pantu, E. A., Karmiyati, D., & Winarsunu, T. (2020). Pengaruh tekanan teman sebaya dan kecemasan menghadapi ujian terhadap ketidakjujuran akademik pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, 8(1), 54–65.
Papalia, D. E., & Martorell, G. (2024). Experience human development (15th ed.). McGraw Hill.
Patnayakuni, A., & Sundaram, S. (2021). Prevalence, types and reasons for academic dishonesty among college students. Journal of Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(1), 1–14.
Pulfrey, C. J., Vansteenkiste, M., & Michou, A. (2019). Under pressure to achieve? The impact of type and style of task instructions on student cheating. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1624.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01624
Rangkuti, A. A., Gazadinda, R., & Yudhistira, S. (2025). Types of academic dishonesty, empathic concern, and peer reporting intention: Indonesian students’ perspective. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(1).
https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.6206
Rettinger, D. A., & Kramer, Y. (2009). Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education, 50(3), 293–313.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9116-5
Ridwan, R., & Diantimala, Y. (2021). The positive role of religiosity in dealing with academic dishonesty. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1–29.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1875541
Rosli, H., Mat Ludin, A. F., Muralitharan, R. V., Ab. Rahman, Q. F., M. Nor, N. S., M. Adli, N. D., M. Hawary, N. U., Khazali, N., Roslan, F. N., Kamaruzaman, N., & Othman, M. S. (2025). Academic dishonesty among health sciences university students in Malaysia: A single centre cross-sectional observation. Education in Medicine Journal, 17(2), 39–50.
https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2025.17.2.4
Sanjaya, B. O. (2024). Hubungan orientasi tujuan personal dengan kecurangan akademik mahasiswa. Jurnal IMAGE, 4(2), 43–63.
Setiawati, F. A., Widyastuti, T., Fathiyah, K. N., & Nabila, T. S. (2024). Minimizing social desirability in questionnaires of non-cognitive measurements. European Journal of Psychology and Educational Research, 7(1), 33–43.
https://doi.org/10.12973/ejper.7.1.33
Stephens, J. M. (2017). How to cheat and not feel guilty: Cognitive dissonance and its amelioration in the domain of academic dishonesty. Theory Into Practice, 56(2), 111–120.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2017.1283571
Subekti, R. L., Herdian, H., & Nuryana, Z. (2024). How to promote honest learning outcomes in online education: Understanding achievement goal orientation and self-efficacy. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 22(63), 267–292.
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2013). Crossing the line: Collusion or collaboration in university group work? Australian Universities’ Review, 55(1), 51–58.
Xu, X., Xia, M., Chen, Q., & Pang, W. (2023). Mastery approach goals mediate the relationship between authenticity and academic cheating: Evidence from cross-sectional and two-wave longitudinal studies. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 4697–4708.
https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S435014
Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aura Putri Amanda, Rozi Sastra Purna, Rani Armalita, Yantri Maputra, Maghfira Assyifa Amandinta Azzahra, Weno Pratama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Copyright in any article is held by the author.
The author grants the journal, publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in an institutional repository or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Abstract views: 0
,
PDF Downloads: 0
