Kohesi Kelompok dan Keterkaitan Kerja pada Prajurit TNI AD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/cjpp.v13n03.p1003-1013Keywords:
Keterkaitan kerja, Kohesi kelompok, Prajurit TNI AD, Psikologi MiliterAbstract
Prajurit TNI AD memiliki tuntutan pekerjaan yang tinggi dan membutuhkan kerja sama dalam menjalankan tgas. Dalam hal itu, keterkaitan kerja dan kohesi kelompok menjadi aspek penting yang berkaitan dengan kondisi psikologis prajurit. Pengujian ini bertujuan untuk mengindikasikan pengaruh antara kohesi kelompok dengan keterkaitan kerja pada prajurit TNI AD berpangkat perwira di Akademi Militer Magelang. Pengujian memakai pendekatan kuantitatif non-eksperimental dengan desain korelasional. Partisipan berjumlah 100 prajurit TNI AD berpangkat perwira yang dipilih memakai purposive sampling. Data dikumpulkan memakai skala kohesi kelompok yang mengacu pada Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) dan skala keterkaitan kerja berdasarkan aspek vigor, dedication, dan absorption. Setelah uji coba, skala kohesi kelompok terdiridari 17 aitem dan skala keterkaitan kerja terdri atas 8 aitem. Analisis data memakai korelasi Spearman dengan bantuan IBM SPSS Statistics 27. Terdapat pengaruh postif dan sig antara kohesi kelompok dengan keterkaitan kerja (ρ = .80; p < .001). Sebanyak 68% partisipan memiliki kohesi kelompok pada kategori sangat tinggi dan 84% memiliki keterkaitan kerja pada kategori sangat tinggi. Terdapat pengaruh positif yang sangat kuat dan signifikan antara kohesi kelompok dengan keterkaitan kerja. Temuan ini mengimplikasikan pentingnya mempertahankan pengaruh interpersonal, kerja sama, dan kebersamaan dalam kelompok sebagai sumber daya sosial yang berkaitan dengan keterkaitan kerja prajurit.
Abstract
TNI AD soldiers face high work demands and require teamwork in carrying out their duties. In this context, work engangement and group cohesion are important aspects associated with soldiers' psychological conditions. This study aimed to examine the relationship between group cohesion and work engangement among TNI AD officer-rank soldiers at the Military Academy in Magelang. This study employd a quantiative non-experimental aproach with a corelational design. The participants were 100 TNI AD officer-rank soldiers selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected using a group cohesion scale based on the Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) and a work engangement scale consisting of vigor, dedication, and absorption. Following the try-out, the group cohesion scale consisted of 17 items and the work engangement scale consisted of 8 items. Data were analyzed using Spearman's correlation with IBM SPSS Statistics 27. The result showeed a postive and significamt relatioship betwen group cohesion and work engangement (ρ = .80; p < .001). A total of 68% of participants had very high group cohesion, while 84% had very high work engangement. Group cohesion had a very strong and significant positive relationship with work engangement. These findings imply the importance of maintaining interpersonal relationships, teamwork, and group connectedness as social resources associated with soldiers' work engangement.
Downloads
References
Ahronson, A. & Cameron, J. E. (2007). The nature and consequences of group cohesion in a military sample. Military Psychology, 19(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995600701323277
Aulia, A.. Sutanto. A., & Hidayat, A. C. (2019). Determinants of work engangement for TNI-AD (Indonesian Armed Forces-Army) personnel. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 35(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v35i1.2881
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti. E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
Bantam, D. J. (2022). Perbedaan work engangement antara pegawai negeri sipil, karyawan swasta, Tentara Nasional Indonesia dan karyawan di bawah yayasan militer. Jurnal Pengujian dan Pengukuran Psikologi: JPPP, 11(1), 3–11.
Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213–226). Fitness Information Technology.
Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrumentt to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7(3), 244–266. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.7.3.244
Castanheira, F., Chambel, M. J., Lopes, S., & Oliveira-Cruz, F. (2016). Relational job characteristics and work engangement: Mediation by prosocial motivation. Military Psychology, 28(4), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/mil0000116
Gillet, N. Becker, C., Lafrenière, M. A. K.. Huart, I., & Fouquereau, E. (2017). Organizational support, job resources, soldiers' motivational profiles, work engangement, and affect. Military Psychology, 29(5), 418–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/mil0000179
Goodwin, G. F., Blacksmith, N., & Coats, M. R. (2018). The science of teams in the military: Contributions from over 60 years of research. American Psychologist, 73(4), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000259
Grossman, R., Nolan, K., Rosch, Z., Mazer, D., & Salas, E. (2022). The team cohesion-performance relationship: A meta-analysis exploring measurement approaches and the changing team landscape. Organizational Psychology Review, 12(2), 181–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866211041157
Ivey, G. W., Blanc, J. R. S., & Mantler, J. (2015). An assessment of the overlap between morale and work engangement in a nonoperational military sample. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(3), 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038559
Kanapeckaitė, R., & Bagdžiūnienė, D. (2024). Relationships between team characteristics and soldiers’ organizational commitment and well-being: The mediating role of psychological resilience. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1353793. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1353793
Mazzetti. G., Robledo, E., Vignoli, M., Topa, G., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Work engangement: A meta-analysis using the job demands-resources model. Psychological Reports, 126(3), 1069–1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211051988
Navas-Jiménez, M. C., Laguía, A., Recio, P., García-Guiu, C., Pastor, A., Edú-Valsania, S., Molero, F., Mikulincer, M., & Moriano, J. A. (2024). Secure base leadership in military training: Enhancing organizational identification and resilience through work engangement. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1401574. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1401574
Nielsen, K., Mazzetti, G., & Guglielmi, D. (2021). The role of group cohesion in work engangement and burnout: A multilevel study among Danish soldiers. Work & Stress, 35(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2020.1801884
Perry, S. J. Johnson, L. U.. Witt, L. A., & McDonald, D. P. (2021). Equipping soldiers to benefit from goal-focused leadership: The moderating effects of non-discriminatory leader behaviors and workgroup cohesion. Military Psychology, 33(5), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2021.1962182
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engangement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
Sundberg, R., & Ruffa, C. (2021). Measurements for the institutional cohesion dimension of the standard model of military group cohesion. Military Psychology, 33(2), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2021.1897491
Tremblay, M. A., & Messervey, D. (2022). Task cohesion over social cohesion in multicultural military operations: A team effectiveness perspective. Military Psychology, 34(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2021.1982456
Winata, A., & Adriansyah, M. A. (2023). Kohesi tim, iklim organisasi, dan keterkaitan kerja prajurit TNI AD di Kalimantan. Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 12(1), 55–70.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Feby leoni intan Lestari, Adi Heryadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Copyright in any article is held by the author.
The author grants the journal, publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in an institutional repository or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Abstract views: 0
,
PDF Downloads: 0
