ANALISIS KETERAMPILAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA SMP BERBANTUAN SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC ISSUE PEMANASAN GLOBAL
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the quality of argumentation skills of junior high school students using the help of socio-scientific issues articles on global warming material. This study adopted a cross-sectional survey design research method with a one-shot survey or test. This study involved 30 seventh grade students of SMPN 62 Surabaya who had received learning materials on global warming. Data collection is based on random sampling technique using a description test instrument with SSI articles. The data analysis technique used in this research is descriptive statistical analysis. The results showed that the quality of students' argumentation skills was still at level 1 and level 2. Based on the argumentation indicators according to Toulmin's Argumentation Pattern, the overall student's argumentation ability was in the poor category, with an average percentage of 57.33% with exposure to each argumentation aspect, claim aspect. in the sufficient category with an average percentage of 63.33%, the data aspect in the less category with an average percentage of 58.88%, the warrant aspect in the less category with an average percentage of 58.88%, the backing aspect in the less with an average percentage of 54.44%, and the qualifier aspect in the less category with an average percentage of 51.11%. The written argumentation skills of seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 62 Surabaya are still relatively low.
References
Abduh, N. K., Sastromiharjo, A., & Anshori, D. S. (2019). Pola Argumentasi Pada Genre Teks Eksposisi Karangan Siswa Sma. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 12(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v12i1.7372
Alfin, M. B., Hidayati, Y., Hadi, W. P., & Rosidi, D. I. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Terhadap Pembelajaran Hypothetico-Deductive Reasoning Dalam Learning Cycle 7E. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(2), 75–81.
Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar - Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 3. Jakarta : PT Bumi Aksara
Atabey, N., & Topcu, M. S. (2017). The Effects of socioscientific issues based instruction on middle school students ’ argumentation quality. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(36), 61–71.
Ayşe Öztürk, A. D. (2019). Development of Argumentation Skills through Socioscientific Issues in Science Course : A Collaborative Action Research 1 Fen Bilimleri Dersinde Sosyobilimsel Konularla Argümantasy on Becerisi Geliştirilmesi : Bir İşbirlikçi Eylem Araştırması Öz. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 52–89. https://doi.org/10.17569/ tojqi.453426
Christenson, N. (2015). Socioscientific argumentation Aspects of content and structure.
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012
Foong, C. C., & Daniel, E. G. S. (2010). Incompetent grounds in science student’s arguments: What is amiss in the argumentation process? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1198–1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.307
Herlanti, Y. (2014). Analisis argumentasi mahasiswa pendidikan biologi pada isu sosiosainfik konsumsi genetically modified organism (GMO). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v3i1.2901
Istiana, R., & Herawatia, D. (2019). Student Argumentation Skill Analysis of Socioscientific Issues in Solving Environmental Problems. Jhss (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies), 3(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v3i1.1096
Kumala, L. H. (2017). Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik Kelas XI IPA MAN 1 Pati Melalui Penulisan Laporan Praktikum Asam Basa dan Larutan Penyangga Berorientasi Science Writing Heuristic (SWH). Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo. http://eprints.walisongo.ac.id/7861/1/Skripsi.pdf
Mahdiannur, M. A., Subekti, H., & Purnomo, A. R. (2020). Eksplorasi Kemampuan Proses Inkuiri Mahasiswa Calon Guru IPA: Perspektif dari Gender dan Lama Studi. Bioedusiana: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 5(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.34289/bioed.v5i1.1636
Noer, H. A., Setiono, & Pauzi, R. Y. (2020). Profil Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa SMP Pada Materi Sistem Pernapasan. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 8(2), 138–144.
Okumus, S., & Unal, S. (2012). The Effects of Argumentation Model on Students’ Achievement and Argumentation Skills in Science. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 457–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.141
Partnership for 21st Century learning. (2015). 21st Century Student Outcomes. 1–9. http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework
Probosari, R. M., Ramli, M., Harlita, H., Indrowati, M., & Sajidan, S. (2016). Profil Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS pada Mata Kuliah Anatomi Tumbuhan. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 9(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v9i1.3880
Rahayu, Y., Suhendar, & Jujun Ratnasari. (2020). Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Pada Materi Sistem Gerak SMA Negeri Kabupaten Sukabumi-Indonesia. Biodik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 6(3), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v6i3.9802
Rahman, D. F. (2018). Analisis Argumentasi dalam Isu Sosiosaintifik Siswa SMP. Thabiea : Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 1(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v1i1.3868
Rahmawati, W., Ratnasari, J., & Suhendar, S. (2018). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pembelajaran Socioscientific Issues Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 6(1), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpp.v6i2.10150
Rohmawati, E., Widodo, W., & Agustini, R. (2018). Membangun Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berkonteks Socio-Scientific Issues Berbantuan Media Weblog. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 3(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v3n1.p8-14
Rostikawati, D. A., & Permanasari, A. (2016). Rekonstruksi bahan ajar dengan konteks socio-scientific issues pada materi zat aditif makanan untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i2.8814
Subiantoro, A. W., Ariyanti, N. A., & Sulistyo. (2013). Pembelajaran materi ekosistem dengan socio-scientific issues dan pengaruhnya terhadap reflective judgment siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v2i1.2508
Sudarmo, N. A., Lesmono, A. D., & Harijanto, A. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berargumentasi ilmiah siswa sma pada konsep termodinamika. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(2), 196–201.
Suraya. (2018). Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah dan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Metode Debat Pada Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati Siswa Kelas X di MAN 1 Natuna Kepulauan Riau. Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak.
Syerliana, L., Muslim, & Setiawan, W. (2018). Argumentation skill profile using “toulmin Argumentation Pattern” analysis of high school student at Subang on topic hydrostatic pressure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012031
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument: Updated edition. In The Uses of Argument: Updated Edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
Triana, D., & Oktavianto, W. O. (2013). Relevansi Kualifikasi Kontraktor Bidang Teknik Sipil Terhadap Kualitas Pekerjaan Proyek Konstruksi Di Provinsi Banten. Jurnal Fondasi, 1(1), 182–190.
Wardani, A. D., Yuliati, L., Taufiq, A., & Artikel Abstrak, I. (2018). Kualitas Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa pada Materi Hukum Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(10), 1364–1372. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/
Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100
Zeidler, D. L., Florida, S., Nichols, B. H., & Florida, S. (2009). Socioscientific Issues : Theory and Practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58.
Copyright (c) 2022 PENSA: E-JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SAINS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract Views: 708
PDF Downloads: 909
