ANALISIS AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA DENGAN PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE BERPASANGAN DENGAN LKPD BERBASIS KASUS

Keywords: make a match cooperative type, case-based student worksheets

Abstract

Science learning can foster students' understanding of ideas in science. Based on this, students are expected to be actively involved during learning to solve problems. This study aims to determine the implementation of learning using the cooperative type pair model with case-based worksheets. The type of research used is observational research with 24 participants from class VIII-A students in a junior high school in Surabaya. Data collection techniques using observation with learning implementation sheets. The data that has been collected is then analyzed using Cohen’s Kappa Coefficient to see the level of agreement of the two observers. The implementation of learning at the first to third meetings has been carried out very well and got agreement with the criteria perfect agreement. Observed student activities indicate active learning, such as doing case-based worksheets, looking for pairs of cards, and discussing. Activities when working on case-based worksheets can spark enthusiasm and motivate students to find solutions to problems on worksheets. Through the cooperative model of the make a match type with case-based worksheets students are actively involved in the process of obtaining information and expanding knowledge through social interaction with peers. This learning model can also be used as a solution in choosing a model when learning in the classroom.

Author Biographies

Amalia Laila, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Program Studi S1 Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Ahmad Qosyim, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Program Studi S1 Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Muhamad Arif Mahdiannur, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Program Studi S1 Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Alimah, S., & Utami, L. (2019). Human reproduction contextual case-based worksheet to improve students’ interpersonal communication and collaboration skills. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 11(2), 256–263. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v11i2.19760

Andreev, V. V., Gorbunov, V. I., Evdokimova, O. K., & Rimondi, G. (2020). Transdisciplinary approach to improving study motivation among university students of engineering specialties. Education and Self Development, 15(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd15.1.03

Arends, R. I. (2015). Learning to teach (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Bernard, J., Chang, T.-W., Popescu, E., & Graf, S. (2017). Learning style Identifier: Improving the precision of learning style identification through computational intelligence algorithms. Expert Systems with Applications, 75, 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.01.021

Caracedo, F. S., Perez-poch, A., Lopez, D., & Salan, N. (2019). Cooperative learning and embedded active learning methodologies for improving students’ motivation and academic results. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6), 1–8. http://hdl.handle.net/2117/171236

Changwong, K., Sukkamart, A., & Sisan, B. (2018). Critical thinking skill development: Analysis of a new learning management model for Thai high schools. Journal of International Studies, 11(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-2/3

Cohen. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104

Dong, Y., Wu, S. X., Wang, W., & Peng, S. (2019). Is the student-centered learning style more effective than the teacher-student double-centered learning style in improving reading performance? Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1–10). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02630

Fayez, A., & Al-zu, M. (2013). The difference between the learner-centred approach and the teacher-centred approach in teaching english as a foreign language. Educational Research International, 2(2), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/932450

Forson, J. A., Ofosu-Dwamena, E., Opoku, R. A., & Adjavon, S. E. (2021). Employee motivation and job performance: a study of basic school teachers in Ghana. Future Business Journal, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00077-6

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. (2023). How to design and evaluate research in education (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Frankl, S., Newman, L., Burgin, S., Atasoylu, A., Fishman, L., Gooding, H., Kamin, D., Puig, A., Thomas, A. M., Cohen, D., & Schwartzstein, R. (2017). The case-based collaborative learning peer observation worksheet and compendium: an evaluation tool for Flipped classroom facilitators. The Journal of Teaching and Learning Resources, 13(1), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10583

Gholami, M., Changaee, F., Karami, K., Shahsavaripour, Z., Veiskaramian, A., & Birjandi, M. (2021). Effects of multiepisode case-based learning (CBL) on problem-solving ability and learning motivation of nursing students in an emergency care course. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(3), 612–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.02.010

Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2008). Looking in class (10th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Gul, R., Batool, S., Khan, S. I., & Jabeen, F. (2023). The effects of social skills on academic competencies. Russian Law Journal, 11(3), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i3s.777

Hanewicz, C., Platt, A., & Arendt, A. (2017). Creating a learner-centered teaching environment using student choice in assignments. Distance Education, 38(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369349

Jones, J. M. (2014). Discussion group effectiveness is related to critical thinking through interest and engagement. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2014.13.1.12

Kyndt, E., Gijbels, D., Grosemans, I., & Donche, V. (2016). Teachers’ everyday professional development: Mapping informal learning activities, antecedents, and learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1111–1150. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627864

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

Lázaro, S. M., León-del-Barco, B., Polo-del-Río, M. I., & López-Ramos, V. M. (2022). The impact of cooperative learning on university students’ academic goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.787210

Leite, L. O., Go, W., & Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2022). Exploring the learning process of experienced teachers focused on building positive interactions with pupils. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1833237

Levine, J. M., Alexander, K. M., Wright, A. G. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2016). Group brainstorming: When regulatory nonfit enhances performance. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19(2), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215577226

Li, M., Gao, Q., & Yu, T. (2023). Using appropriate Kappa statistic in evaluating inter-rater reliability. Chemosphere, 328(3), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138565

Marler, E. K., Bruce, M. J., Abaoud, A., Henrichsen, C., Suksatan, W., Homvisetvongsa, S., & Matsuo, H. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on university students’ academic motivation, social connection, and psychological well-being. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000294

McHugh, M. L. (2012). Lessons in biostatistics interrater reliability : The kappa statistic. Biochemica Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031

Møgelvang, A., Vandvik, V., Ellingsen, S., Strømme, C. B., & Cotner, S. (2023). Cooperative learning goes online: teaching and learning intervention in a digital environment impacts psychosocial outcomes in biology students. International Journal of Educational Research, 117(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102114

Montagud, M. Á. C., Campos, V. S., López, M. V. E., & Palomino, S. V. (2020). Cooperative learning and brainstorming as didactic strategies in conservation and restoration of cultural assets. Journal of Education for Teaching, 3(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.4995/inn2019.2019.10089

Morales, S. B.-, Jerez-Mayorga, D., Fernández-González, F. T., & López-Morales, J. (2020). The use of a cooperative-learning activity with university students: a gender experience. Sustainability, 12(21), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219292

Nguyen, B., Athauda, G., Kashan, S. B., Weiler, T., & Toonkel, R. L. (2021). A small group case based learning activity. Journal of Teaching and Learning Resources, 3(17), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11176

Özyurt, Ö., & Özyurt, H. (2015). Learning style based individualized adaptive e-learning environments: Content analysis of the articles published from 2005 to 2014. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.020

Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8

Pronin, E. (2007). Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.001

Raadt, A. de, Warrens, M. J., Bosker, R. J., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2021). A comparison of reliability coefficients for ordinal rating scales. Journal of Classification, 38(3), 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-021-09386-5

Rau, G., & Shih, Y. S. (2021). Evaluation of Cohen’s kappa and other measures of inter-rater agreement for genre analysis and other nominal data. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 53(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101026

Rogowsky, B. A., Calhoun, B. M., & Tallal, P. (2015). Matching learning style to instructional method: Effects on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037478

Samarraie, H., & Hurmuzan, S. (2018). A review of brainstorming techniques in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.002

Slavin, R. (2002). Educational psychology theory and practice (8th ed.). Pearson.

Smit, B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2018). Observations in qualitative inquiry: When what you see is not what you see. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918816766

Stonier, F., & Adarkwah, M. A. (2023). Impact of STEM Professional Development Sessions on Chinese Pre-service Early Childhood Teachers. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 3(1), 68–93. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v3i1.96

Taherdoost, H. (2018). Validity and reliability of the research instrument: How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. SSRN Electronic Journal, 5(3), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040

Uygun, M. A. (2020). Achievement goal orientations of students studying instrument education as predictors of their learning approaches. Music Education Research, 22(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2020.1713735

Vaznoyi, A. T., Pickering, L., Junger, M., & Hessing, D. (2013). Observer bias in observational research: A review. Jorunal of Criminal Justice, 41(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.11.009

Yula, D. (2017). Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe make a match untuk meningkatkan prestasi belajar IPS materi perjuangan mempertahankan kemerdekaan pada siswa kelas V SD Negeri 2 Sanden. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Published
2023-07-31
How to Cite
Laila, A., Qosyim, A., & Mahdiannur, M. A. (2023). ANALISIS AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA DENGAN PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE BERPASANGAN DENGAN LKPD BERBASIS KASUS. PENSA: E-JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SAINS, 11(2), 194-200. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa/article/view/54696
Section
Articles
Abstract Views: 21
PDF Downloads: 17