Transforming Junior High School Teachers' Basic STEM Knowledge through Training to Strengthen STEM-Based Mathematics Learning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v15n3.p597-612

Abstract

The implementation of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) based mathematics learning depends on teachers’ conceptual understanding of interdisciplinary integration. Although STEM has been widely introduced through training programs, prior studies indicate that junior high school mathematics teachers’ understanding remains partial. This study aims to describe how STEM training transforms teachers’ understanding in conceptual, applicative, and affective aspects. This study used a qualitative descriptive design with a pretest–posttest approach, analyzing teachers’ responses through content analysis to identify patterns of conceptual change. The study involved 30 junior high school mathematics teachers selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using pretest and posttest open-ended essay questions and analyzed through coding and thematic categorization. The findings revealed that before the training, most teachers perceived STEM merely as a combination of subjects, without clearly understanding how science, technology, engineering, and mathematics are integrated through problem-solving processes, design activities, and specific learning objectives. After the training, a clear shift occurred, with most teachers developing more accurate and integrated conceptions of STEM. They were able to explain STEM as an interdisciplinary approach focused on problem solving rather than subject integration alone. In practice, most teachers reached a contextual level of implementation by providing authentic examples such as real-world problem-solving activities, simple engineering design tasks, and the integration of mathematical calculations and technology. Teachers’ confidence also increased significantly, indicating greater readiness to implement STEM-based learning. These findings highlight the importance of continuous and well-designed STEM training program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Endah Budi Rahaju, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Ahmed, S. K. (2024). How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research : A simplified guide for researchers Sirwan Khalid Ahmed To cite this version : HAL Id : hal-04718988. Oral Oncology Reports, 12, 100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662

AlAli, R. (2024). ENHANCING 21ST CENTURY SKILLS THROUGH INTEGRATED STEM EDUCATION USING PROJECT-ORIENTED PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites ISSN, 53(2), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.53205-1217

Ardiyansyah, R., Diella, D., & Suhendi, H. Y. (2020). Pelatihan Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Abad 21 Dengan Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Berbasis STEM Bagi Guru IPA. 10, 31–36.

Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2021). What is Qualitative in Research. Qualitative Sociology, 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-021-09497-w

Bastian, A., Sari, E., Awal, R., Whayuni, S., & Chahyadi, E. (2025). STEM Integration Training in Learning for Teachers of SMK Kesehatan Proskill Indonesia Pekanbaru and Tualang. DINAMISIA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 9(3), 949–958.

Boz, T. (2023). Teacher Professional Development for STEM Integration in Elementary / Primary Schools : A Systematic Review. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 15(5), 371–382.

Dare, E. A., Keratithamkul, K., & Hiwatig, B. M. (2021). education sciences Beyond Content : The Role of STEM Disciplines , Real-World Problems , 21st Century Skills , and STEM Careers within Science Teachers ’ Conceptions of Integrated STEM Education. Education Sciences, 1–22.

Dwita, L., & Susanah. (2020). PENERAPAN PENDEKATAN SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DI SMK PADA JURUSAN BISNIS KONSTRUKSI DAN PROPERTI. MATHEdunesa Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 276–285.

Dwyer, A. O., Hourigan, M., Leavy, A. M., & Corry, E. (2023). ’ I Have Seen STEM in Action and It ’ s Quite Do ‑ able !’ The Impact of an Extended Professional Development Model on Teacher Efficacy in Primary STEM Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21, 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10361-2

Ferdiansyah, F., Noer, S. H., & Widyantuti. (2025). ENHANCING SECONDARY STUDENTS ’ MATHEMATICAL CREATIVE THINKING THROUGH STEM PROJECT-BASED LEARNING. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 47–66.

Gao, X., Li, P., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, 1–14.

Hallström, J., Norström, P., & Schönborn, K. J. (2023). Authentic STEM education through modelling : an international Delphi study. International Journal of STEM Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00453-4

Jamaluddin, R., Haslinda, N., Shah, M., Hazwan, M., Puad, M., & Mohd, E. K. (2023). The Integration of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics ( STEM ) in Home Science : Teachers ’ Understanding and Challenges. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 2(2), 42–50.

Jowsey, T., Deng, C., & Weller, J. (2021). General-purpose thematic analysis : a useful qualitative method for anaesthesia research. BJA Education, 21(12), 472–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjae.2021.07.006

Kelley, T. R., Knowles, J. G., Holland, J. D., & Han, J. (2020). Increasing high school teachers self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice. International Journal of STEM Education, 1–13.

Kong, S. F., & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2022). Can a Science , Technology , Engineering , and Mathematics ( STEM) Approach Enhance Students ’ Mathematics Performance ? Sustaunability, 14(379).

Kusmaryono, I., Aminudin, M., Ubaidah, N., & Chamalah, E. (2024). THE BRIDGING UNDERSTANDING OF LANGUAGE AND MATHEMATICAL SYMBOLS BETWEEN TEACHERS AND STUDENTS: AN EFFORT TO INCREASE MATHEMATICAL LITERACY. Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(1), 251–270.

Liu, J., Wang, K., & Pan, Z. (2025). The Effectiveness of Professional Development in the Self-Efficacy of In-Service Teachers in STEM Education: 1–24.

Martínez-Borreguero, G., Naranjo-Correa, F. L., & Mateos-Núñez, M. (2022). Cognitive and Emotional Development of STEM Skills in Primary School Teacher Training through Practical Work. Education Sciences, 1–21.

Monaro, S., Gullick, J., & West, S. (2022). Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Research: A Step-by-Step Example of Phenomenological Interpretation Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Research : A Step-by-Step Example of. 27(4), 1040–1057.

Mubarik, Permata, D., Pathuddin, Anggraini, Nasir, R., Alfisyahra, Meinarni, W., Fajriani, Desti, Rumi, M. F., Ulfiana, D., & Muazin, M. (2022). Analysis of the Application of STEM Approaches in Mathematics Learning in Junior High Schools. Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(2), 108–114.

Nirwan, Faudi, Isra, R., & AG, B. (2024). QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH : INTEGRATING INQUIRY- BASED LEARNING INTO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ENGLISH. Getsempena English Education Journal (GEEJ), 11(1), 1–15.

OECD. (2023). Pisa 2022 Results. In Factsheets: Vol. I. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/country-notes/germany-1a2cf137/

Rahmawati, T. D., & Ndori, V. H. (2022). Implementation of Mathematics Learning With A STEM Approach ( Science , Technology , Engineering , And Mathematics ) at MTs Muhammadiyah Wuring Implementasi Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan STEM ( Science , Technologi , Engineering , And Mathematics ) di Mts Muhammadiyah Wuring. 7, 330–341.

Saputri, V., & Herman, T. (2022). INTEGRASI STEM DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA: DAMPAK TERHADAP KOMPETENSI MATEMATIKA ABAD 21. 5(1), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v5i1.247-260

Sari, F. A., & Juandi, D. (2021). MATHEMATICS TEACHERS ’ PERCEPTION ABOUT STEM-BASED LEARNING. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 23–34.

Villamin, P., Lopez, V., Thapa, D. K., & Cleary, M. (2024). A Worked Example of Qualitative Descriptive Design : A Step Guide for Novice and Early Career Researchers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 5181–5195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16481

Zhou, X., Shu, L., Xu, Z., & Padrón, Y. (2023). The effect of professional development on in ‑ service STEM teachers ’ self ‑ efficacy : a meta ‑ analysis of experimental studies. International Journal of STEM Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00422-x

Zuhaida, A., Widodo, A., Prima, E. C., & Solihat, R. (2025). STEM professional development: A decade of progress. 22(1), 1–17.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-19
Abstract views: 0 , PDF Downloads: 0