Peer Review Process

The MATHEdunesa editorial board has created the following steps for reviewing policies:The Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen editorial board has created the following steps for reviewing policies:
All submissions to this journal must adhere to its Focus, Scope, and Author Guidelines. The submitted manuscripts must demonstrate scientific excellence or novelty consistent with the journal's emphasis and scope. 

All manuscripts that are submitted must be original works. It is advised that all authors perform similarity checks using plagiarism detection software (please use Turnitin or iThenticate to check the similarity). The similarity of the manuscripts submitted to this journal will also be checked by the editors using the Turnitin or iThenticate tools. 


The publications submitted to this journal will undergo peer review by two or more experts from the Reviewer Acknowledgement. The reviewers provide useful scientific suggestions improving the contents of the manuscript.

The final decision of acceptance of the manuscript is made solely by the Editor in Chief (along with the Editorial Board if required for consideration) according to reviewers’ critical comments. The final decision of the manuscript is based solely on the Editor and Editorial Board final review which considering peer-reviewer comments. (but not solely by Reviewer).The final decision of acceptance of the manuscript is made solely by the Editor in Chief (along with the Editorial Board if required for consideration) according to reviewers’ critical comments. The final decision of the manuscript is based solely on the Editor and Editorial Board final review which considering peer-reviewer comments. (but not solely by Reviewer).

Publication of accepted articles including the assignment of the article to published issue will be made by the Editor in Chief by considering xeveral consideration.