Hubungan antara Religiusitas dengan Komitmen Organisasi pada Organisasi Mahasiswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/cjpp.v13n03.p784-791Keywords:
Komitmen organisasi, mahasiswa, organisasi mahasiswa, religiusitasAbstract
Organisasi mahasiswa yang bersifat non-profit sangat mengandalkan tenaga sukarela, sehingga seringkali menghadapi tantangan terkait komitmen keanggotaan. Idealnya, religiusitas dapat difungsikan sebagai jangkar moral internal untuk menggantikan peran insentif finansial demi menjaga loyalitas anggota. Namun, fenomena di lapangan menunjukkan bahwa tergabung dalam organisasi bernuansa religi tidak menjamin anggotanya berkomitmen sesuai dengan nilai integritas dan amanah dari agama itu sendiri. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara religiusitas dengan komitmen organisasi pada mahasiswa pengurus organisasi. Penelitian kuantitatif ini menggunakan desain korelasi non-parametrik Spearman’s Rho. Subjek penelitian berjumlah 80 fungsionaris aktif yang diperoleh melalui teknik total sampling. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan adaptasi skala Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS) dan Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ). Analisis data menunjukkan nilai koefisien korelasi r = 0,374 dengan signifikansi p = 0,001 (p < 0,05), yang berarti terdapat hubungan positif dan signifikan pada tingkat kekuatan yang cukup. Religiusitas memberikan kontribusi sebesar 13,9% terhadap komitmen organisasi. Dimensi komitmen afektif menjadi yang paling dominan, sementara dimensi ideologi tidak berkorelasi secara signifikan. Religiusitas berhubungan signifikan dengan komitmen organisasi, namun tidak dapat diandalkan sebagai satu-satunya faktor penentu. Organisasi perlu memperkuat praktik keagamaan kolektif untuk membangun ikatan afektif dan menginternalisasi nilai amanah agar mahasiswa memiliki tanggung jawab moral untuk bertahan.
Abstract
Non-profit student organizations rely heavily on voluntary efforts, often facing challenges regarding member commitment. Ideally, religiosity can function as an internal moral anchor to substitute the role of financial incentives in maintaining member loyalty. However, field phenomena indicate that joining a faith-based organization does not guarantee its members will commit in accordance with the integrity and trustworthiness (amanah) values of the religion itself. This study aims to determine the relationship between religiosity and organizational commitment among active student organization members. This quantitative research employed a non-parametric Spearman’s Rho correlational design. The subjects consisted of 80 active functionaries obtained through a total sampling technique. Data collection used the adapted Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS) and Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ). Data analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of r = 0.374 with a significance of p = 0.001 (p < 0.05), indicating a positive and significant relationship with moderate strength. Religiosity contributed 13.9% to organizational commitment. The affective commitment dimension was the most dominant, whereas the ideology dimension showed no significant correlation. Religiosity is significantly correlated with organizational commitment but cannot be solely relied upon as a single determining factor. Organizations need to strengthen collective religious practices to build affective bonds and internalize the value of amanah to foster students' moral responsibility to remain committed.
Downloads
References
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021212
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
Farrukh, M., Wei Ying, C., & Abdallah Ahmed, N. O. (2016). Organizational commitment: Does religiosity matter? Cogent Business and Management, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1239300
Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1974). American Piety: The Nature of Religious Commitment. University of California Press.
Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710–724. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710
Luan, X., Song, H., & Kim, T. (2020). The influence of organizational culture and religiosity on organizational commitment. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no12.1017
McCormick, L., & Donohue, R. (2019). Antecedents of volunteer commitment: A student-volunteer perspective. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(4), 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21345
Mehdad, A., & Iranpour, M. (2014). Relationship between religious beliefs, workplace happiness and organizational commitment. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology, 15(2), 562–568.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(00)00053-X
Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1983). Motivation and Work Behavior. McGraw-Hill.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Wang, R. (2022). Organizational commitment in the nonprofit sector and the underlying impact of stakeholders and organizational support. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 33(3), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00336-8
Yusuf, R. M., & Syarif, D. (2017). Komitmen Organisasi: Definisi, Dipengaruhi dan Mempengaruhi. Nas Media Pustaka.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Haikal Muhammad Al Ghifari, Yohana Wuri Satwika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Copyright in any article is held by the author.
The author grants the journal, publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in an institutional repository or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Abstract views: 0
,
PDF Downloads: 0
