Hubungan Antara Parasocial Relationship dengan Subjective Well-Being Pada Penggemar K-Pop
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/cjpp.v12n02.p761-773-Keywords:
Hubungan parasosial, kesejahteraan subjektif, penggemar k-popAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara parasocial relationship dan subjective well-being pada penggemar K-Pop di usia emerging adulthood (18–29 tahun). Parasocial relationship merupakan hubungan satu arah yang dirasakan oleh penggemar terhadap idolanya, sedangkan subjective well-being merupakan penilaian kognitif dan afektif individu terhadap kehidupannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif korelasional dengan teknik purposive sampling dan melibatkan 120 responden anggota grup KPOPERS JATIM Surabaya. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner Parasocial Relationship Scale dan skala Subjective Well-Being, yang telah diuji validitas dan reliabilitasnya. Hasil uji Pearson menunjukkan terdapat hubungan positif dan signifikan antara parasocial relationship dan subjective well-being dengan nilai koefisien korelasi sebesar 0,477 dan signifikansi 0,000 (p < 0,05). Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa semakin kuat hubungan parasosial seseorang dengan idolanya, semakin tinggi kesejahteraan subjektif yang dirasakan.
Abstract
This study aims to examine the relationship between parasocial relationship and subjective well-being among K-Pop fans in the emerging adulthood age range (18–29 years). A parasocial relationship refers to a one-sided emotional bond experienced by fans toward their idols, while subjective well being are individuals cognitive and affective evaluations of their lives. This research used a quantitative correlational method with purposive sampling, involving 120 respondents from the KPOPERS JATIM Surabaya community. Data were collected using the Parasocial Relationship Scale and Subjective Well Being Scale, both of which were tested for validity and reliability. Pearson correlation analysis showed a positive and significant relationship between parasocial relationship and subjective well-being, with a correlation coefficient of 0.477 and a significance level of 0.000 (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that the stronger a fan’s parasocial relationship with their idol, the higher their subjective well-being.
Downloads
References
Almaida, R., Gumelar, S. A., & Laksmiwati, A. A. (2021). Dinamika psikologis fangirl k-pop. Cognicia, 9(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.22219/cognicia.v9i1.15059
Arnett, J. J., Žukauskienė, R., & Sugimura, K. (2014). The new life stage of emerging adulthood at ages 18–29 years: Implications for mental health. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(7), 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00080-7
Brito, A. D., & Soares, A. B. (2023). Well-being, Character Strengths, and Depression in Emerging Adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(1238105), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1238105
Claessens, N., & Van Den Bulck, H. (2015). Parasocial relationships with audiences’ favorite celebrities: The role of audience and celebrity characteristics in a representative Flemish sample. Communications, 40(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2014-0027
Das, K. V., Jones-Harrell, C., Fan, Y., Ramaswami, A., Orlove, B., & Botchwey, N. (2020). Understanding subjective well-being: Perspectives from psychology and public health. Public Health Reviews, 41(25), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-020-00142-5
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (2 ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.013.0017
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6
Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2004). Global Judgments of Subjective Well-Being: Situational Variability and Long-Term Stability. Social Indicators Research, 65(3), 245–277. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000003801.89195.bc
Hartmann, T. (2016). Parasocial Interaction, Parasocial Relationship, and Well Being. Routledge.
Hoffner, C. A., & Bond, B. J. (2022). Parasocial relationships, social media, & well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45(101306), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101306
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction: Observations on Intimacy at a Distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
Jannah, M. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif untuk Psikologi. Unesa University Press.
Juniarti, W. (2024). Pengaruh Parasocial Relationship terhadap Subjective Well Being Pengemar K-Pop (Skripsi Sarjana, Universitas Sumatera Utara). https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/99950
Kim, M., & Kim, J. (2020). How does a celebrity make fans happy? Interaction between celebrities and fans in the social media context. Computers in Human Behavior, 111(106419), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106419
Kim, M. S., Wang, S., & Kim, S. (2023). Effects of Online Fan Community Interactions on Well-Being and Sense of Virtual Community. Behavioral Sciences, 13(897), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110897
Krouse, E. J. (2024). Friend or Faux: A Scientific Comparison of Reciprocal Relationships and Parasocial Relationships and Their Psychological Effects (Honors Thesis, Eastern Kentucky University). https://encompass.eku.edu/honors_theses/1058
Lotun, S., Lamarche, V. M., Matran-Fernandez, A., & Sandstrom, G. M. (2024). People perceive parasocial relationships to be effective at fulfilling emotional needs. Scientific Reports, 14(8185), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58069-9
Mardhatillah, R., & Ningsih, Y. T. (2023). Kontribusi Dimensi Celebrity Worship terhadap Subjective Well-Being pada Mahasiswa K-Popers Universitas Negeri Padang. IJESPG Journal, 1(3), 96–106. https://ijespgjournal.org/index.php/ijespg/article/view/43
Nelson, L. J. (2020). The Theory of Emerging Adulthood 20 Years Later: A Look at Where It Has Taken Us, What We Know Now, and Where We Need to Go. Emerging Adulthood, 9(3), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696820950884
Perbawani, P. S., & Nuralin, A. J. (2021). Hubungan Parasosial dan Perilaku Loyalitas Fans dalam Fandom KPop di Indonesia. Jurnal Lontar, 9(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.30656/lontar.v9i1.3056
Rahmawati, A. (2024). Adaptasi Alat Ukur Parasocial Relationship Scale Pada Remaja (Skripsi Sarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia). http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/115785
Siegenthaler, P., Aegerter, T., & Fahr, A. (2023). A Longitudinal Study on the Effects of Parasocial Relationships and Breakups With Characters of a Health-Related TV Show on Self-Efficacy and Exercise Behavior: The Case of The Biggest Loser. Communication & Sport, 11(4), 744–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795211045039
Stein, J.-P., Liebers, N., & Faiss, M. (2024). Feeling Better...But Also Less Lonely? An Experimental Comparison of How Parasocial and Social Relationships Affect People’s Well-Being. Mass Communication and Society, 27(3), 576–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2022.2127369
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). ALFABETA.
Supratiknya, A. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif & Kualitatif dalam Psikologi. Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Uyun, M., & Yoseanto, B. L. (2022). Seri Buku Psikologi: Pengantar Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Deepublish.
Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction research. Social Indicators Research, 37(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300268
Voukelatou, V., Gabrielli, L., Miliou, I., Cresci, S., Sharma, R., Tesconi, M., & Pappalardo, L. (2021). Measuring objective and subjective well-being: Dimensions and data sources. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 11(4), 279–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-020-00224-2
Watson, D., Anna, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
William, Sheng, J., Qiang, Y., Joanne, Q. Y., & Syah, I. A. (2022). Assessing subjective well-being: A review of common measures. Hogrefe.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Layyina Sadira, Nanda Audia Vrisaba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Copyright in any article is held by the author.
The author grants the journal, publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in an institutional repository or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Abstract views: 5
,
PDF Downloads: 0
