Hubungan antara Otonomi Kerja dengan Keterikatan Kerja Pada Karyawan PT X
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/cjpp.v12n01.p240-253Keywords:
Otonomi Kerja, Keterikatan Kerja, KaryawanAbstract
Perusahaan menghadapi tantangan dalam menciptakan lingkungan kerja yang mendukung bertahannya produktivitas karyawan secara optimal. Perubahan produktivitas ini berhubungan erat dengan sejauh mana karyawan merasa terlibat dan terikat dengan pekerjaannya. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui hubungan otonomi kerja dan keterikatan kerja pada karyawan PT. X. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif dengan jumlah populasi sebanyak 100 orang dan menggunakan teknik sampling jenuh yakni menggunakan keseluruhan populasi sebagai sampel. Alat ukur yang digunakan adalah skala keterikatan kerja dan perilaku produktif. Teknik analisis data menggunakan korelasi Pearson Product Moment. Hasil analisis menunjukkan nilai signifikansi sebesar 0.000 (p < 0.05) dengan koefisien korelasi sebesar 0.603, yang berarti terdapat hubungan yang signifikan dan kuat antara otonomi kerja dengan keterikatan kerja. Semakin tinggi otonomi kerja yang dimiliki karyawan, semakin tinggi pula keterikatan kerja yang ditunjukkan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa keterikatan kerja berperan penting dalam membentuk perilaku kerja yang produktif.
Abstract
Companies face the challenge of creating a work environment that supports the maintenance of optimal employee productivity. This productivity change is closely related to the extent to which employees feel involved and attached to their work. This study was conducted to determine the relationship between work autonomy and work engagement in employees of PT X. The research method used is quantitative with a population of 100 people and using saturated sampling technique, namely using the entire population as a sample. The measuring instrument used is a scale of work engagement and productive behavior. Data analysis techniques using Pearson Product Moment correlation. The results of the analysis showed a significance value of 0.000 (p < 0.05) with a correlation coefficient of 0.603, which means there is a significant and strong relationship between job autonomy and work engagement. The higher the work autonomy of employees, the higher the work engagement shown. This study concludes that work engagement plays an important role in shaping productive work behavior.
Downloads
References
Adisyah, D. R., & Mulyana, O. P. (2023). Hubungan Quality of Work Life dan Work Engagement Pada Karyawan. Character : Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 10(01), 384–396. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/character/article/view/53559/42829
Anggraini, S. W., & Mulyana, O. P. (2022). Hubungan Antara Tuntutan Kerja Dengan Keterikatan Kerja Pada Karyawan Tetap Pt. X. Character Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 9(7), 27-29.
Azwar, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yoyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L., & Leiter, M. P. (2011). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.485352
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Dalam Journal of Managerial Psychology (Vol. 22, Nomor 3, hlm. 309–328). https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476
Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. L. (2018). Work engagement: Current trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2017-0207
Bayoumy, S. A. (2019). Relationship between Job characteristics and Work Engagement among Nursing Staff. International Journal of Nursing Didactics, 09(01), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.15520/ijnd.v9i01.2406
Bipp, T., & Walczok, M. (2024). The Paradoxical Effects of High Work Methods and Work Scheduling Autonomy. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000431.
Capri, B., Gündüz, B., & Akbay, S. E. (2017). Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Student Forms'(UWES-SF) Adaptation to Turkish, Validity and Reliability Studies, and the Mediator Role of Work Engagement between Academic Procrastination and Academic Responsibility. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 17(2), 411-435.
Damayanti, T. P., & Hendarsjah, H. (2019). Hubungan Job Autonomy dengan Work Engagement dan Emotional Exhaustion (Studi pada Karyawan IT, Marketing dan Agen Asuransi di Berbagai Perusahaan di Solo Raya) Relationship Between Job Autonomy with Work Engagement and Emotional Exhaustion (Study on IT Employees, Marketing Employees, and Insurance Agent at Multi Industry Companies in Solo Raya). Jurnal Studi Manajemen Indonesia, 70(1), 70–82. https://jsmi.feb.uns.ac.id
Demerouti, E., Derks, D., Ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). New ways of working: Impact on working conditions, work-family balance, and well-being. Dalam The Impact of ICT on Quality of Working Life (hlm. 123–141). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8854-0_8
Darmaviani, P. G. M., & Puspitadewi, N. W. S. (2023). Hubungan Antara Iklim Organisasi dengan Komitmen Organisasi dan Keterikatan Kerja pada Karyawan di PT. X Sidoarjo. Character Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 10(1), 924-934
De Spiegelaere, S., Gyes, G., & Hootegem, G. (2016). Not all autonomy is the same. Different dimensions of job autonomy and their relation to work engagement & innovative work behavior. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 26(4), 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20666
Gillet, N., Berjot, S., Vallerand, R. J., & Amoura, S. (2012). The role of autonomy support and motivation in the prediction of interest and dropout intentions in sport and education settings. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(3), 278-286.
Hidayat, W. G. P. A. (2023). The Influence of Employee Engagement, Work Environment and Job Characteristics on Job Satisfaction and Performance. JEMSI (Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi), 9(4), 1652–1659. https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v9i4.1413
Jannah, M. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Untuk Psikologi. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9)
Kenyatta, J., & Odhiambo, R. (2014). Relationship between Job Characteristics and Employee Engagement among State Corporations in Kenya. International Joural of Innovative Research & Studies, Vol 3 Issues 5, 327–350. www.ijirs.com
Khairunnisa, I., & Halida, A. N. (2024). Perilaku Organizational Citizenship Behavior pada Karyawan. INCARE, International Journal of Educational Resources, 5(2), 160-168
Kidane, A., & Xuefeng, Z. (2021). Exploring the relationship between Job autonomy and employee engagement in turbulent times. International Journal of Research In Business and Social Science, 10, 134-152. https://doi.org/10.20525/IJRBS.V10I2.1074.
Knies, E., Leisink, P., & van de Schoot, R. (2020). People management: developing and testing a measurement scale. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(6), 705-737.
Lina, N. P. I. M. (2019). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penentu Employee Engagement di PT. ABC Bandung. Ekuitas: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.23887/ekuitas.v7i2.17233
Malinowska, D., Tokarz, A., & Wardzichowska, A. (2018). Job autonomy in relation to work engagement and workaholism: Mediation of autonomous and controlled work motivation. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 31(4), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01197
Moen, P., Kelly, E. L., Tranby, E., & Huang, Q. (2011). Changing work, changing health: can real work-time flexibility promote health behaviors and well-being?. Journal of health and social behavior, 52(4), 404-429.
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
Murillo, H. J. G., Ortega, J. M. T., & Niebles, W. (2024). Engagement and Performance at Work: Relationship between Motivation, Concentration and Persistence in the Work Environment. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(5), 1485-1494.
Mutadayyinah, Y., & Mulyana, O. P. (2022). Hubungan antara Otonomi Pekerjaan dengan Perilaku Kerja Inovatif pada Guru. Character: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 9(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/cjpp.v9i3.46391
Nuryadi, Astuti, T. D., Utami, E. S., & Budiantara, M. (2017). Dasar-dasar Statistik Penelitian. www.sibuku.com
Paramitta, A., Putra, A.I.D., Sarinah,. (2020). Work Engagement Ditinjau dari Psychological Well-Being pada Karyawan PT. Sumatera Berlian Motors. Philanthropy Jounal of Psychology, 4(1), 2580-8532.
Permata, F., & Mangundjaya, W. (2021). The role of work engagement in the relationship of job autonomy and proactive work behavior for organizational sustainability. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 716. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/716/1/012055.
Pri, R. (2017). GAMBARAN WORK ENGAGEMENT PADA KARYAWAN DI PT EG (MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY). Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni, 1(2),295–303. https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/jmishumsen/article/viewFile/981/927
Seppälä, P., Mäkikangas, A., Hakanen, J. J., Tolvanen, A., & Feldt, T. (2020). Is autonomy always beneficial for work engagement? A six-year four-wave follow-up study. Journal for Person-Oriented Research, 6(1), 16.
Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). Applying the Job Demands-Resources model: A ‘how to’ guide to measuring and tackling work engagement and burnout. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.008
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2014). Optimising employee mental health: The relationship between intrinsic need satisfaction, job crafting, and employee well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 957-977.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sung, M., Yoon, D. Y., & Han, C. S. H. (2022). Does job autonomy affect job engagement? Psychological meaningfulness as a mediator. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 50(5), 1-10.
Suryowibowo, K., & Syakarofath, N. A. (2024). Peran job autonomy terhadap work engagement pada karyawan. Cognicia, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.22219/cognicia.v12i2.37223
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dyah Alfu Putri Hanum, Olievia Prabandini Mulyana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Copyright in any article is held by the author.
The author grants the journal, publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in an institutional repository or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Abstract views: 46
,
PDF Downloads: 7
